2009
DOI: 10.1002/chp.20042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interrater reliability to assure valid content in peer review of CME-accredited presentations

Abstract: Interrater reliability on the rating of durable materials used in subspecialty CME was poor. Guidelines for CME appropriate content are too subjective to be applied reliably by raters knowledgeable in their specialty field but relatively untrained in the specifics of CME requirements. The process of peer review of CME materials would be aided by education of physicians on validation of materials appropriate for CME.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 Although studies show that physicians do not perceive differences in commercial bias between industryfunded and non-industry funded CME, 16−20 it is unclear whether physicians can accurately assess the independence or scientific validity of CME activities. 21 An educational intervention about industry influence was developed for grand rounds presentations by physicians associated with PharmedOut (http://www.pharmedout.org), a university-based physician-run project founded with public funds to educate physicians and medical students about inappropriate pharmaceutical promotion. This article describes the effects of this intervention.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Although studies show that physicians do not perceive differences in commercial bias between industryfunded and non-industry funded CME, 16−20 it is unclear whether physicians can accurately assess the independence or scientific validity of CME activities. 21 An educational intervention about industry influence was developed for grand rounds presentations by physicians associated with PharmedOut (http://www.pharmedout.org), a university-based physician-run project founded with public funds to educate physicians and medical students about inappropriate pharmaceutical promotion. This article describes the effects of this intervention.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%