2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interregional comparison of benthic ecosystem functioning: Community bioturbation potential in four regions along the NE Atlantic shelf

Abstract: Bioturbation is one of the key mediators of biogeochemical processes in benthic habitats that can have a high contribution to seafloor functioning and benthic pelagic coupling in coastal waters. Previous studies on bioturbation were limited to point locations and extrapolations in single regions, but have not accounted for regional differences under changing environmental conditions, though there are indications that species contributions will differ across regions or with biotic and abiotic context. To captur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(116 reference statements)
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These remotely sensed acoustic data sets have demonstrated considerable potential to map seabed substrate (e.g., Diesing et al, 2014;Misiuk et al, 2018), single species distributions (e.g., Galparsoro et al, 2009;Brown et al, 2012), macrofaunal assemblage patterns (e.g., Lacharité and Brown, 2019), and seabed landscapes sometimes referred to as "seascape" (e.g., Boström et al, 2011;Shaw et al, 2014) or "benthoscape" maps (Zajac, 2008;Brown et al, 2012). The next step in the evolution of these methods is to develop models to extrapolate biogeochemical processes at the fine/millimeter-tocentimeter scale (Figure 1a) to broader spatial scales (Figure 1b), utilizing spatial data to improve estimates Smeaton and Austin, 2019;Gogina et al, 2020), which is limited primarily by the paucity of remotely sensed acoustic data sets, with less than 9% of the ocean floor currently mapped by these modern, remote sensing systems (Mayer et al, 2018). At global scales, ocean digital elevation models, produced using satellite-gravity models that calibrate the gravity-to-topography ratio using bathymetric soundings (Becker et al, 2009), must rely on considerably coarser data resolution than similar terrestrial models (e.g., Figure 1c).…”
Section: Oc and Macrofaunal Dynamics In Marine Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These remotely sensed acoustic data sets have demonstrated considerable potential to map seabed substrate (e.g., Diesing et al, 2014;Misiuk et al, 2018), single species distributions (e.g., Galparsoro et al, 2009;Brown et al, 2012), macrofaunal assemblage patterns (e.g., Lacharité and Brown, 2019), and seabed landscapes sometimes referred to as "seascape" (e.g., Boström et al, 2011;Shaw et al, 2014) or "benthoscape" maps (Zajac, 2008;Brown et al, 2012). The next step in the evolution of these methods is to develop models to extrapolate biogeochemical processes at the fine/millimeter-tocentimeter scale (Figure 1a) to broader spatial scales (Figure 1b), utilizing spatial data to improve estimates Smeaton and Austin, 2019;Gogina et al, 2020), which is limited primarily by the paucity of remotely sensed acoustic data sets, with less than 9% of the ocean floor currently mapped by these modern, remote sensing systems (Mayer et al, 2018). At global scales, ocean digital elevation models, produced using satellite-gravity models that calibrate the gravity-to-topography ratio using bathymetric soundings (Becker et al, 2009), must rely on considerably coarser data resolution than similar terrestrial models (e.g., Figure 1c).…”
Section: Oc and Macrofaunal Dynamics In Marine Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predictive models of bio-mediated physical dynamics should be based on generally valid physicochemical and biological laws (van Prooijen, et al, 2011), able to encompass the broad span of functional (Queirós, et al, 2013) and spatial (Gogina, et al, 2020) diversity observed in nature. The individual size is a generally valid descriptor of the intensity of individual bioturbation activity, with larger bioturbators having a higher bioturbation potential (Solan, et al, 2004b;Gilbert, et al, 2007) and generating a greater increase in resuspension of bottom sediment (Cozzoli, et al, 2018;Cozzoli, et al, 2019) and chlorophyll-a (Rakotomalala, et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there have been numerous studies on reproductive trait variability across wide latitudinal ranges, local variability is often ignored (Lester et al, 2007;Reed et al, 2014). However, evidence of species resilience through plasticity to regional and subtle environmental variations could still provide essential information to understanding the future distribution of benthic macrofauna (Byrne, 2011) and the maintenance of ecosystem functioning (Gogina et al, 2020;McLean et al, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%