Interrogating accountability

Abstract

Purpose -The paper has a dual purpose, being to report on an interrogation of concepts and contexts of accountability used in the accounting literature and to illustrate the application of a qualitative data analysis software tool in this interrogation. Design/methodology/approach -A content analysis was undertaken of 114 journal articles related to accountability and published in highly ranked accounting journals from 2000 to 2007. Findings -Accountability is a concept used in a variety of contexts, particularly in connection with public accountabilities and accountability in the public sector, as well as within social contexts. The emphasis appears to be on accountability reporting in these settings, with less concern for the management perspective. The variety of contextual usage and categorisations of the term "accountability" indicate it has not become more precise over the period in question.Research limitations/implications -Since only 21 accounting journals are sampled, there is scope for investigating accountability concepts across a broader base of publication outlets. The findings suggest that greater effort should be devoted to developing frameworks of accountability, researching accountability in relatively under-explored contexts and settings, and considerable scope for researchers to more frequently utilise computer-assisted qualitative data analysis in content analysis studies concerning accounting and accountability. Originality/value -While there is anecdotal evidence of the elusive nature of accountability, this paper provides a window on conceptions of accountability employed by accounting scholars and the contexts in which accountability is discussed and researched. Further, the use of the Leximancer software tool in qualitative content analysis is demonstrated, noting that the accounting literature is currently devoid of examples of applications of this software.

Hearing the Voices of Wingless Angels: A Critical Content Analysis of Nurses’ COVID-19 Experiences

“…This shows the links among words, concepts, and themes in the software concept maps, which will be considered in the result interpretation section. Leximancer groups concepts into themes according to how often they appear together in a text [ 49 ].…”

Shaping Sustainable Employment and Social Consequences of Indigenous Australians in a Remote Region

“…In the first step, the investigative process was designed to fulfil semantical and relational objectives by extracting a ranked list of concepts through the calculation of the frequency and cooccurrence of words in the typed textual information that was generated from the 25 interviews. In the second step, the program applied these extracted lists of concepts to propagate a treasure of words, which was closely related to the concepts, and thus, generating semantical and relational content around the concept [38] Finally, Leximancer categorized the similar and related concepts into a theme according to the level of significance and the frequency of the cooccurrence [38][39][40][41]. In addition, an indepth understanding to the interpretation of the results were undertaken independently by the researchers.…”

Unveiling Research Trends for Organizational Reputation in the Nonprofit Sector

“…Although year after year, research is published addressing the reputational aspects of nonprofits, to date, no literature analysis has been conducted with the goal of understanding the trends and shifts in research on the organizational reputation of nonprofits. Nonetheless, other reputational related topic trends are present in literature, such as philanthropy (Bekkers and Wiepking 2010), accountability (Crofts and Bisman 2010), and the effectiveness (Lecy 2012). Despite these efforts, the input data applied for such research covers a limited timeframe and distinct analysis techniques are applied, i.e.…”