2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.02.15.21251771
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interrogating structural inequalities in COVID-19 Mortality in England and Wales

Abstract: Background Numerous observational studies have highlighted structural inequalities in COVID-19 mortality in the UK. Such studies often fail to consider the complex spatial nature of such inequalities in their analysis, leading to the potential for bias and an inability to reach conclusions about the most appropriate structural levels for policy intervention. Methods We use publicly available population data on COVID-19 related- and all-cause mortality between March and July 2020 in England and Wales to invest… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the differences all but disappear between the ethnic groups when the index is recalculated for the age-standardised mortality rates, In fact, the Pakistani group does still have the highest value for 8 of the 11 months but the differences are trivial and illegible on the chart. The implication of this is that urban inequalities in mortality are more strongly expressed at the regional level and between major towns and cities (Gri th et al, 2021), whereas inequalities in infection are evident within towns and cities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, the differences all but disappear between the ethnic groups when the index is recalculated for the age-standardised mortality rates, In fact, the Pakistani group does still have the highest value for 8 of the 11 months but the differences are trivial and illegible on the chart. The implication of this is that urban inequalities in mortality are more strongly expressed at the regional level and between major towns and cities (Gri th et al, 2021), whereas inequalities in infection are evident within towns and cities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The Pakistani group does still have the highest value for 10 of the 14 months but the differences are trivial and illegible on the chart. The implication of this is that urban inequalities in mortality are more strongly expressed at the regional level and between major towns and cities (Griffith et al, 2021), whereas inequalities in infection are evident within towns and cities too.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…England imposed a national lockdown during the first wave of the COVID-19 epidemic in March 2020 (19). This measure aimed to drastically reduce instances of interpersonal contact between infected individuals (whether symptomatic or not) and the wider susceptible population.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been noted that when national epidemic dynamics are used to examine population health, they can mask important sub-national variation in disease spread, thus mitigation strategies that rely solely on the national data to inform implementation timings could inadvertently worsen health inequalities across geographical areas (11,13). Previous descriptive studies and reports of inequalities in COVID-19 mortality have only focused on cumulative measures over set timespans, without documenting the disparities in evolution of mortality rates (5,14,15), have been restricted to higher geographies (18), or have not focussed on the effects of lockdowns (7,19). An understanding of how the evolution of the pandemic differed by area and the impact of national mitigation strategies on geographical inequalities in COVID-19 mortality could help inform future policies targeted at minimising viral spread whilst preventing the widening (or even actively decreasing) health inequalities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%