2022
DOI: 10.1155/2022/1354337
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interrogative Sentences Recognition Based on the GRU Multiattentive Layer Model

Abstract: Understanding the question is the key point in the question answering system. Therefore, this paper designs a multi attention layer model, extracts some missing features from the storage module, and uses Gru unit to organize them reasonably. By using non-linear operations to combine the results of different attention layers, we can avoid extracting only the linear combination of memory modules. Effectively combine the process of problem understanding, including the classification of problem words, the vocabula… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two-Way Loop GRU. e three types of recurrent neural networks can process time series, but the information flow can only be passed from the front to back in time [27,28]. Recurrent neural networks are so dependent on the order of data that the features extracted by forwarding processing of data and reverse processing of data by using recurrent neural networks may be completely different.…”
Section: Design Of Fault Diagnosis Model For Rolling Bearingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two-Way Loop GRU. e three types of recurrent neural networks can process time series, but the information flow can only be passed from the front to back in time [27,28]. Recurrent neural networks are so dependent on the order of data that the features extracted by forwarding processing of data and reverse processing of data by using recurrent neural networks may be completely different.…”
Section: Design Of Fault Diagnosis Model For Rolling Bearingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%