Public Relations, Society and the Generative Power of History 2019
DOI: 10.4324/9780429451287-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intersectional activism, history and public relations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather than confining power to the C-suite and activists as always in opposition to the corporate interest, activist publics also offer opportunities to study the "potential to create power and salience through advocacy" (Coombs & Holladay, 2012, p. 885). Since their critique, the literature has widened to include consideration of activism in/as public relations from further critical cultural perspectives (see, for example, Demetrious, 2013;Holtzhausen, 2012;Vardeman et al, 2020), and to nuanced corporate contexts (Pompper, 2015). Summarily, these studies all treat activism as a rich site of public relations understood "to be fundamentally about producing, sustaining, and regulating… meaning" (Edwards & Hodges, 2011, p. 3).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than confining power to the C-suite and activists as always in opposition to the corporate interest, activist publics also offer opportunities to study the "potential to create power and salience through advocacy" (Coombs & Holladay, 2012, p. 885). Since their critique, the literature has widened to include consideration of activism in/as public relations from further critical cultural perspectives (see, for example, Demetrious, 2013;Holtzhausen, 2012;Vardeman et al, 2020), and to nuanced corporate contexts (Pompper, 2015). Summarily, these studies all treat activism as a rich site of public relations understood "to be fundamentally about producing, sustaining, and regulating… meaning" (Edwards & Hodges, 2011, p. 3).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%