2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intersectional inequalities in loneliness among older adults before and during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic: A total population survey in the Swedish eldercare setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding demonstrates the additive nature of the multiple forms of marginality in shaping young people’s SWB and echoes intersectionality theory (McCall, 2005). At its core, intersectionality theory emphasizes the intertwinement of complex social positions across multiple dimensions of power or inequity and its consequences regarding how societal changes generate, amplify, or temper inequalities (Bauer, 2014; Gustafsson et al, 2022). This theory thus suggests that inequality of any type cannot be understood or mitigated by approaches that treat identities and social positions as distinct subjects of inquiry and lived experiences are embedded within multiple, intersecting, and mutually constitutive systems of social, economic, and political power and reflective of them (Bauer, 2014; McCall, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding demonstrates the additive nature of the multiple forms of marginality in shaping young people’s SWB and echoes intersectionality theory (McCall, 2005). At its core, intersectionality theory emphasizes the intertwinement of complex social positions across multiple dimensions of power or inequity and its consequences regarding how societal changes generate, amplify, or temper inequalities (Bauer, 2014; Gustafsson et al, 2022). This theory thus suggests that inequality of any type cannot be understood or mitigated by approaches that treat identities and social positions as distinct subjects of inquiry and lived experiences are embedded within multiple, intersecting, and mutually constitutive systems of social, economic, and political power and reflective of them (Bauer, 2014; McCall, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the study findings support the general view of intersectionality, the hypothesis and methodological approach do not directly or fully address intersectionality’s core arguments as presented in the current public health literature (e.g., Bauer & Scheim, 2019; Guan et al, 2021). For example, I did not empirically examine the distribution of GLS within intersectional strata (e.g., Gustafsson et al, 2022) or the nonadditive effect of multiple identities and social positions on the lived experiences of individuals, that is, the fact that axes of inequality intersect to create unique social positions that cannot be explained as the sum of their parts (e.g., Bauer & Scheim, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An exception is the extended work of Gustafsson et al (2022) among older adults, which identified inequalities in loneliness by intersectional strata (age, gender, type of residence, income, and country of birth). Gustafsson et al (2022) identified the role of intersectionality in the risk for loneliness, as the most disadvantaged group had the highest risk. Last, we could not find any studies exploring intersectionality in light of the UN SDGs.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies that examined mental health outcomes within the contexts of intersectionality typically focused on a few oppressive mechanisms at a time, primarily gender, race, and/or sexual orientation (e.g., Seng et al, 2012; Vu et al, 2019). An exception is the extended work of Gustafsson et al (2022) among older adults, which identified inequalities in loneliness by intersectional strata (age, gender, type of residence, income, and country of birth). Gustafsson et al (2022) identified the role of intersectionality in the risk for loneliness, as the most disadvantaged group had the highest risk.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…También se ha evidenciado la presencia de ansiedad, miedo y problemas anímicos, destacando la depresión como una de las características más relevantes (Nascimento et al, 2023;Wang et al, 2023). Las desigualdades económicas y las características del entorno y la vivienda pueden agravar estas situaciones emocionales de manera variable (Gustafsson et al, 2022). Además, se ha observado que la participación limitada en actividades de ocio puede contribuir a la exacerbación de las emociones negativas (Nakanishi et al, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified