2020 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/respect49803.2020.9272484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intersectional Perspectives on Teaching: Women of Color, Equity, and Computer Science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We attributed this lack of clarity to the lower Cronbach's α and revised the item to "Faculty who require students to refer to them as Dr. or Professor are being too strict." We also maintained this item because of the important nuance that is captured (including experiences of faculty from minoritized groups who have reported being referred to by first name or not as faculty versus faculty from non-minoritized groups who sometimes note they do not care how students address them [51], [55]). In addition, examples of identities to consider (e.g., race, gender, sexuality, ability, and class) were removed from most items, and definitions of identity, diversity, equity, and inclusion were provided at the beginning of the assessment for clarity and to minimize text.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We attributed this lack of clarity to the lower Cronbach's α and revised the item to "Faculty who require students to refer to them as Dr. or Professor are being too strict." We also maintained this item because of the important nuance that is captured (including experiences of faculty from minoritized groups who have reported being referred to by first name or not as faculty versus faculty from non-minoritized groups who sometimes note they do not care how students address them [51], [55]). In addition, examples of identities to consider (e.g., race, gender, sexuality, ability, and class) were removed from most items, and definitions of identity, diversity, equity, and inclusion were provided at the beginning of the assessment for clarity and to minimize text.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%