2020
DOI: 10.1080/13552074.2020.1843829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intersectionality and collective action: visioning a Feminist Green New Deal in the US

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many activists and scholars have called for moving away from fossil-fuel-based recovery not just to slow down climate breakdown, but for better post-pandemic fiscal recovery that includes climate financing that is gender-accountable (Hepburn et al, 2020). Some recent examples put forth by activists are the Feminist Green New Deal in the USA (Daniel & Dolan, 2020) and Feminist Fossil Free Future in the Asia-Pacific (Godden et al, 2020). Such endeavors would require multi-scalar, gender-disaggregated data collection, greater monitoring, accountability, adequate capacities, and budgetary resources allocated for intersectional analyses and thus responsiveness and redress where necessary.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many activists and scholars have called for moving away from fossil-fuel-based recovery not just to slow down climate breakdown, but for better post-pandemic fiscal recovery that includes climate financing that is gender-accountable (Hepburn et al, 2020). Some recent examples put forth by activists are the Feminist Green New Deal in the USA (Daniel & Dolan, 2020) and Feminist Fossil Free Future in the Asia-Pacific (Godden et al, 2020). Such endeavors would require multi-scalar, gender-disaggregated data collection, greater monitoring, accountability, adequate capacities, and budgetary resources allocated for intersectional analyses and thus responsiveness and redress where necessary.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, eco-feminist thinking places great importance on democratic processes of transformation and challenges the idea of eco-social policy as a technocratic issue to be solved by political elites and academics. Many have criticised the underrepresentation of women and feminist movements from climate policy making, and demanded more democratic processes to address systemic inequalities (Daniel and Dolan, 2020; Gay-Antaki, 2020). Some extend the demand to the democratic management of eco-social services and workplaces (Williams, 2021) as well as public investment decisions (Mellor, 2019).…”
Section: Eco-feminismmentioning
confidence: 99%