Intersectionality and nursing leadership: An integrative review

Abstract

Aims and objectives This review aimed to synthesise international research about how intersectionality has been used to explore issues within the nursing profession. The objectives were to determine which intersecting variables have been explored, how intersectionality has been operationalised, and the implications for nursing leadership. Background Barriers to health system leadership created at the intersection of gender, race, ethnicity, professional cadre and other socially constructed categories exist in the health workforce. Consequently, an intersectionality paradigm has been recommended to explore power, privilege and oppression issues in the nursing profession. Design An integrative systematic review method was selected for its ability to include diverse methodologies. The review complies with the PRISMA guidelines for reporting systematic reviews. Method The search terms nurs* nurses nursing AND Intersectionality intersectional intersectionalism, intersect were used in December 2021 to search the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL Plus) PsycINFO, PubMed, Ovid, ProQuest and the first ten pages of Google Scholar from 2011 to 2021. Directed content analysis was applied to the data. Results Access to education, absence of expectations as a career and patriarchal structures support male nurses into positions of leadership in healthcare systems. Intra‐group differences highlight the paradox of homogenous categories for ethnicity and gender. Being a member of an ethnic minority group hinders career progression regardless of gender. The aftereffects of colonisation exist within the nursing space. Conclusions This review is the first to synthesise research using intersectionality to explore the impact of socially constructed identities on nursing leadership. There is a dearth of evidence specific to this topic, ignoring the diversity within this professional group. Future research should include intersectionality to discover how social categories empower or impede a nurse's career progression to leadership roles. Relevance to clinical practice An intersectionality paradigm can encourage nurses to attend to issues of power, privilege and oppression in the profession and their practice.

Women of Color in the Health Professions: A Scoping Review of the Literature

“…Findings from 16 publications showed bias and/or inequities by gender and race (see Table 1). Eleven articles used an intersectional lens [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. There were inequities/biases associated with career progression, rate of promotion, admission into health professions, and remuneration.…”

Board talk: How members of executive hospital boards influence the positioning of nursing in crisis through talk

“…Nevertheless, we cannot deny the asymmetric power relations (Aspinall et al, 2022;Kee et al, 2021) and the gendered images (Essex et al, 2023;Langley et al, 2019) that exist of and between board members and nurses in crises. As Lopez-Deflory et al (2023a) recently stated; "Nurses play an active role not, only in the reproduction of the institutional status quo which maintains their subordination, but also in the challenge of the complex network of power that constitutes its subordination (…).…”

Factors Influencing the impact of nurse practitioners’ clinical autonomy: a self determining perspective

“…Intersectionality refers to the recognition of how multiple social identities, such as race, gender and historically women's emancipations, class and sexual orientation, impact extrinsic motivation (Aspinall et al, 2022). The discourse of NPs has been associated with a portrayal of being 'different in nursing' and 'the first in the specialism' , encouraging a level of mistrust from a positionality and classification sense.…”