Intersections of Inequality: Understanding Marginalization and Privilege in the Post-Civil Rights Era

Abstract

The post-civil rights era has left an important dilemma in U.S. politics. Despite the fact that the United States has become more integrated across racial and gendered lines since the 1960s, inequality, particularly economic inequality, has grown. Although much of that inequality continues to fall along racial, gender, and class lines, the opportunities afforded by the "rights revolution" have also created an important heterogeneity of privilege within marginal groups. As social scientists, how best can we identify the sources and results of this inequality? More specifically, how can we better understand the crosscutting political effects of both marginalization and privilege within and among groups in U.S. society? I contend that intersections theory may be a useful place to begin, and that the idea of intersectionality could provide a fruitful framework with which to understand issues of inequality in the post-civil rights era. Such a framework would help address some of the theoretical problems that sometimes arise within empirical work on marginal groups in political science and, ideally, allow scholars to understand better how experiences of marginalization and privilege affect the shape and character of American political life.

Standing in the intersection : using Photovoice to understand the lived experience of black gay college students attending predominantly white postsecondary institutions.

“…And when they appear to destroy me, it will not be long before they appear to destroy you. (Lorde, 1983) The passage above is an excerpt from (Bedolla, 2007;Crenshaw, 1989).…”

“…parts of their human identity (Bedolla, 2007). Intersectionality describes the phenomenon of social identities acting on each other (i.e.…”

“…Beyond the focus of Crenshaw's original argument, an intersectional perspective challenges us to explore other forms of identity intersection (Bedolla, 2007;Collins, 2000;Crenshaw, 1989Crenshaw, , 1993.…”

“…Researchers in these fields were unclear whether an "intersectional analysis" should focus on identity sans the influence of social structures and questioned its appropriateness as a "grand theory" bringing together lived experience and social structures (Davis, 2008;Haslanger, 2014;McCall, 2005). For political science, with less interest in individual identity development, this new way of understanding identity has offered very little in the way of interpreting collective identity or group behavior (Bedolla, 2007). Furthermore, categorical identities are less informative when compared to quantifiable relational aspects of group identity and stigma (i.e., collective identity), which have no constraints on the number or variation of group memberships (Bedolla, 2007).…”

“…For political science, with less interest in individual identity development, this new way of understanding identity has offered very little in the way of interpreting collective identity or group behavior (Bedolla, 2007). Furthermore, categorical identities are less informative when compared to quantifiable relational aspects of group identity and stigma (i.e., collective identity), which have no constraints on the number or variation of group memberships (Bedolla, 2007). …”