Intersectoral Planning for Public Health: Dilemmas and Challenges

Abstract

Background: Intersectoral action is often presented as essential in the promotion of population health and health equity. In Norway, national public health policies are based on the Health in All Policies (HiAP) approach that promotes whole-of-government responsibility. As part of the promotion of this intersectoral responsibility, planning is presented as a tool that every Norwegian municipality should use to integrate public health policies into their planning and management systems. Although research on implementing the HiAP approach is increasing, few studies apply a planning perspective. To address this gap in the literature, our study investigates how three Norwegian municipalities experience the use of planning as a tool when implementing the HiAP approach. Methods: To investigate planning practices in three Norwegian municipalities, we used a qualitative multiple case study design based on face-to-face interviews. When analysing and discussing the results, we used the dichotomy of instrumental and communicative planning approaches, in addition to a collaborative planning approach, as the theoretical framework. Results: The municipalities encounter several dilemmas when using planning as a tool for implementing the HiAP approach. Balancing the use of qualitative and quantitative knowledge and balancing the use of structural and processual procedures are two such dilemmas. Other dilemmas include balancing the use of power and balancing action and understanding in different municipal contexts. They are also faced with the dilemma of whether to place public health issues at the forefront or to present these issues in more general terms. Conclusion: We argue that the dilemmas experienced by the municipalities might be explained by the difficult task of combining instrumental and communicative planning approaches because the balance between them is seldom fixed.

Status and Challenges of Public Health Emergency Management in China Related to COVID-19

“…What is needed in the connected global community is mutual support and cross-border multi-sectoral collaboration. Only when there is trust, cooperation, and understanding among governments, prevention and control agencies, and health emergency agencies, can emergencies be handled efficiently (27).…”

Capacity building for intersectoral action for health by local governments is needed: a policy brief

“…Además, se ha evidenciado una falta de compromiso 11 , responsabilidad política y rendición de cuentas en cuestiones de salud 7 . En términos generales, existe una falta de capacidad para abordar la promoción de la salud desde un enfoque intersectorial en los gobiernos locales 9,15,16 .…”

“…Junto a estas recomendaciones, las autoras proponen que sea el sector salud quien asuma el liderazgo en este proceso. Contar con un referente claro para avanzar en la integración de la perspectiva de la salud en todas las áreas es el apunte más frecuentemente realizado en la literatura, unido a la consolidación de un grupo de trabajo intersectorial 6,9,11,[14][15][16]31 . El sector salud puede acompañar los procesos de implementación de enfoques como la SeTP y la creación de capacidad en los sectores.…”

Factors influencing delivery of intersectoral actions to address infant stunting in Bogotá, Colombia – a mixed methods case study.

“…Recognition of health as a collaborative outcome, management approach, teamwork skills and techniques, are all factors that trigger ISA (6). In this regard, the literature regarding ISA implementation emphasizes that sectors must overcome the challenging task of facilitating meeting points across departments and hierarchical levels (17).…”