2021
DOI: 10.3389/ffunb.2021.656751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interspecies Genomic Variation and Transcriptional Activeness of Secondary Metabolism-Related Genes in Aspergillus Section Fumigati

Abstract: Filamentous fungi produce various bioactive compounds that are biosynthesized by sets of proteins encoded in biosynthesis gene clusters (BGCs). For an unknown reason, many BGCs are transcriptionally silent in laboratory conditions, which has hampered the discovery of novel fungal compounds. The transcriptional reactiveness of fungal secondary metabolism is not fully understood. To gain the comprehensive view, we conducted comparative genomic and transcriptomic analyses of nine closely-related species of Asperg… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A major outstanding question emanating from our work is whether this extensive non-coding sequence variation of closely related Aspergillus species that vary in their pathogenicity functionally contributes to differences in gene expression between strains and species. Currently, there are no datasets available that report genome-wide differential expression data for A. fumigatus and close relatives; to our knowledge, the only published differential expression study of A. fumigatus and close relatives focused on expression differences only for genes involved in secondary metabolism (Takahashi et al, 2021). Designing and performing differential gene expression experiments in diverse Aspergillus species will be a future aim.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A major outstanding question emanating from our work is whether this extensive non-coding sequence variation of closely related Aspergillus species that vary in their pathogenicity functionally contributes to differences in gene expression between strains and species. Currently, there are no datasets available that report genome-wide differential expression data for A. fumigatus and close relatives; to our knowledge, the only published differential expression study of A. fumigatus and close relatives focused on expression differences only for genes involved in secondary metabolism (Takahashi et al, 2021). Designing and performing differential gene expression experiments in diverse Aspergillus species will be a future aim.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fungi, non-coding regions found immediately upstream of genes' protein-coding regions are bound by transcription factors (TFs), impact transcriptional activity (Kim et al, 2019), and play roles in vital biological processes such as zinc homeostasis (Eide, 2020) and thermotolerance (Yamamoto et al, 2008). Differences in gene expression have become an important focus in understanding A. fumigatus virulence (Chung et al, 2014;de Castro et al, 2014;Furukawa et al, 2020;Ries et al, 2020;Takahashi et al, 2021;Colabardini et al, 2022). However, the role non-coding regions play in differential gene regulation between A. fumigatus and close relatives remains largely unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we assembled the mitochondrial genome of strain 29R-4-F02, which has a length of 26,185 bp and contains 13 genes, including 7 NADH–ubiquinone oxidoreductase genes, 3 cytochrome c oxidase genes, 1 cytochrome b gene, 1 ribosomal protein gene, and 1 ATP synthase gene, with a GC content of 23.67%. The size and number of genes in the mitochondrial genome of strain 29R-4-F02 are similar to those of other Aspergillus species, with genome sizes ranging from 27,817 to 77,649 bp and gene numbers ranging from 14 to 21 ( Zhao et al, 2012 ; Takahashi et al, 2021 ; Jing et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The annotation of assembled nuclear genomes was performed by the Funannotate pipeline (ver. 1.7.4) ( https://funannotate.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ ) as described previously (Takahashi et al ., 2021 ). Following identification of repeat sequences by RepeatModeler (ver.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%