2020
DOI: 10.1111/evo.14049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interspecific allometry for sexual shape dimorphism: Macroevolution of multivariate sexual phenotypes with application to Rensch's rule

Abstract: Allometric trends in the degree of sexual dimorphism with body size have long fascinated evolutionary biologists. Many male‐biased clades display more prominent sexual dimorphism in larger taxa (Rensch's rule), with most examples documenting this pattern for body size dimorphism. Although sexual dimorphism in traits other than body size is equally functionally relevant, characterizing allometric patterns of sexual dimorphism in such traits is hampered by lack of an analytical framework that can accommodate mul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
(112 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…test to determine if the true slope differs from b 0 1 = . There has been considerable discussion in the allometric literature as to whether model I or model II regression is more appropriate, in part because species values for both males and females are measured with error (see e.g., Wharton et al 2006;Bonduriansky 2007;Ives et al 2007;Hansen and Bartoszek 2012;Killmer and Rodríguez 2017;Adams et al 2020). However, as pointed out by Kilmer and Rodríguez (2017), when measurement error variance is small in proportion to total variance, slope attenuation is limited, and slopes from model I regression are robust.…”
Section: Statistical Evaluation Of Allometric Patterns Involves Phylogenetic Regression and A Slopementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…test to determine if the true slope differs from b 0 1 = . There has been considerable discussion in the allometric literature as to whether model I or model II regression is more appropriate, in part because species values for both males and females are measured with error (see e.g., Wharton et al 2006;Bonduriansky 2007;Ives et al 2007;Hansen and Bartoszek 2012;Killmer and Rodríguez 2017;Adams et al 2020). However, as pointed out by Kilmer and Rodríguez (2017), when measurement error variance is small in proportion to total variance, slope attenuation is limited, and slopes from model I regression are robust.…”
Section: Statistical Evaluation Of Allometric Patterns Involves Phylogenetic Regression and A Slopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, natural and sexual selection may result in sexual dimorphism in traits other than body size. These include, for example, coloration, behavioral, physiological traits, or shape (Endler 1984;Price and Birch 1996;Adams et al 2020;Logan et al 2021). Importantly, behavioral or functional traits, such as climbing or jumping, which are typically characterized as measures of maximum or 'peak' performance, will respond directly to selection (Arnold 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two hypotheses above should also apply to traits other than body size. When a sexually dimorphic trait occurs in both sexes, but is under directional sexual selection in males only, a pattern consistent with RR should emerge [10]. In fact, although almost all studies on RR focus on body size, Rensch's original proposal was broad in scope and included sexual differences in other traits [1,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, although almost all studies on RR focus on body size, Rensch's original proposal was broad in scope and included sexual differences in other traits [1,10]. Accordingly, recent studies with sexually selected male traits, such as wing pigmentation in dragonflies [11] and head shape in lizards [10], showed patterns consistent with RR. To our knowledge, however, there are no studies showing that RR applies to sexually selected traits that are present in both © 2021 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation