2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.asd.2004.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interspecific morphological variation in the wood-feeding cockroach, Cryptocercus (Dictyoptera: Cryptocercidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, however, Aldrich et al (2004a) indicated that a substantial population of cockroaches with the allozyme and molecular characteristics of C. wrighti have the same chromosome number as C. punctulatus ; they nonetheless considered this population C. wrighti . A recently published paper purporting to support the species definitions of Burnside et al (2000) with morphological data (Aldrich et al , 2004b) did not address this discrepancy, nor did it reconcile discordance with morphological data already in the literature ( e.g ., Fig. 7 in Nalepa et al, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Recently, however, Aldrich et al (2004a) indicated that a substantial population of cockroaches with the allozyme and molecular characteristics of C. wrighti have the same chromosome number as C. punctulatus ; they nonetheless considered this population C. wrighti . A recently published paper purporting to support the species definitions of Burnside et al (2000) with morphological data (Aldrich et al , 2004b) did not address this discrepancy, nor did it reconcile discordance with morphological data already in the literature ( e.g ., Fig. 7 in Nalepa et al, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…In addition to characterizing aspects of family group co-occurrence for the purpose of understanding sub-sociality, the present study also provides an opportunity to examine the adequacy of randomly sampling a single C. punctulatus individual per rotting log (e.g., Steinmiller, Kambhampati & Brock, 2001; Aldrich, Krafsur & Kambhampati, 2004; Aldrich, Zolnerowich & Kambhampati, 2004). Based on levels of genetic differentiation among co-occurring haplotypes seen here, the one-sample-per-log strategy would fail to fully capture within-log diversity about half of the time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that copulation between adults likely takes place within the same gallery of the rotting log in which the pair later raise their family, mate pairs have been considered monogamous since opportunities for extra-pair copulation are few (but see Nalepa & Grayson, 2011). Although the spatial demarcation of family groups is difficult, sampling strategies employed in several molecular studies of C. punctulatus have used a single random sample (e.g., Steinmiller, Kambhampati & Brock, 2001; Aldrich, Krafsur & Kambhampati, 2004; Aldrich, Zolnerowich & Kambhampati, 2004). Depending on the question at hand, this may be adequate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is necessary to find new morphological characters to identify Anaplecta species. Although female genitalia were considered to have fewer useful morphological characters in the taxonomy of cockroaches, Aldrich et al (2004) successfully identified four Cryptocercus species based on female genitalia. Female genitalia have also been used in the identification of Cryptocercus (Wang et al 2015;Bai et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%