2019
DOI: 10.1002/ecy.2698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interspecific prey neighborhoods shape risk of predation in a savanna ecosystem

Abstract: The vulnerability of an individual to predation depends on the availability of other prey items in the surrounding environment. Interspecific prey aggregations or “neighborhoods” may therefore affect an individual's vulnerability to predation. We examined the influence of prey neighborhood structure (i.e., the densities and identities of prey neighborhoods) on spatial variation in predation in a multi‐prey system with a primary apex predator. We combined GPS locations of lions (Panthera leo), kill‐site surveys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
(215 reference statements)
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zebras were the only species that responded positively to megaherbivores, consistent with previous research in this system (Goheen et al, 2013;Kimuyu et al, 2017). This may in part be because megaherbivores increase visibility by reducing stalking cover for large carnivores such as lions Panthera leo (Ng'weno et al, 2019;Riginos & Grace, 2008). Additionally, megaherbivores could increase zebra occurrence and use intensity by enhancing grass cover (zebras in this system eat ≥95% grass, more than any other species; .…”
Section: How Megaherbivores Affect Mesoherbivores Is Predicted By Sho...supporting
confidence: 85%
“…Zebras were the only species that responded positively to megaherbivores, consistent with previous research in this system (Goheen et al, 2013;Kimuyu et al, 2017). This may in part be because megaherbivores increase visibility by reducing stalking cover for large carnivores such as lions Panthera leo (Ng'weno et al, 2019;Riginos & Grace, 2008). Additionally, megaherbivores could increase zebra occurrence and use intensity by enhancing grass cover (zebras in this system eat ≥95% grass, more than any other species; .…”
Section: How Megaherbivores Affect Mesoherbivores Is Predicted By Sho...supporting
confidence: 85%
“…Instances where apparent competition has been implicated in limiting ungulate populations are becoming numerous, including bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis), mountain caribou (Rangifer tarandus), huemul (Hippocamelus bisulcus), and roan antelope (Hippotragus equinus; Harrington et al, 1999;DeCesare et al, 2010;McLellan et al, 2010;Wittmer et al, 2013;but see O'Brien et al, 2018 for an example contrary to the hypothesis of apparent competition involving Grevy's zebra [E. grevyi] in Laikipia). In our study system, spatial separation between zebra and hartebeest improved survival rates of hartebeest, probably by reducing encounters with lions hunting in areas with high zebra densities (Ng'weno et al;Ng'weno, 2017 in revision; see also Palmer et al, 2003;Forrester and Steele, 2004). Strategic placement of glades therefore offers a promising approach to creating refuges for hartebeest and perhaps other species of secondary prey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…These lions belonged to 5 different prides, which collectively accounted for ca. 80% of lions on Ol Pejeta (Ng'weno et al;Ng'weno, 2017 in revision). Overlap between home ranges of prides was minimal (1-12%) throughout the course of our study (Ng'weno et al in revision).…”
Section: Prey Selectivity Of Lionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effect of alternative prey density is included in the concept of “neighborhood effects” in predator–prey interactions. In a savanna system, lion predation depended upon both the composition and abundance of other prey species in the local area (i.e., the prey neighborhood; Ng'weno et al, 2019). Similarly, a neighborhood effect occurred between streams: The amount of salmon killed by bears in a stream decreased with prey abundance in surrounding streams (Quinn et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%