1979
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.2210530169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interstitial iron and thermal defects in silicon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After quenching from 950 • C and aging for several days at room temperature, DLTS shows only one line. From the shift of this line with correlation frequency of the Lock-in measuring system, the emission characteristics, i. e. the hole emission rate of the defect as a function of temperature, have been determined (ionization enthalpy: 0.10 eV, capture cross section: σ = 1.7 × 10 −14 cm 2 ) and found to fit with those measured for iron-boron pairs by Graff and Pieper [7] and Feichtinger [8]. The concentration calculated from the line amplitude is equal to the solubility of iron in silicon at 950 • C. Annealing at 200 • C for 30min, quenching and immediate DLTS-registration results in a spectrum with two lines of comparable amplitudes at the positions expected for (FeB) (0/+) and Fe i (0/+) (compare curve A in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…After quenching from 950 • C and aging for several days at room temperature, DLTS shows only one line. From the shift of this line with correlation frequency of the Lock-in measuring system, the emission characteristics, i. e. the hole emission rate of the defect as a function of temperature, have been determined (ionization enthalpy: 0.10 eV, capture cross section: σ = 1.7 × 10 −14 cm 2 ) and found to fit with those measured for iron-boron pairs by Graff and Pieper [7] and Feichtinger [8]. The concentration calculated from the line amplitude is equal to the solubility of iron in silicon at 950 • C. Annealing at 200 • C for 30min, quenching and immediate DLTS-registration results in a spectrum with two lines of comparable amplitudes at the positions expected for (FeB) (0/+) and Fe i (0/+) (compare curve A in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…[2][3][4][5] This can be very detrimental to device region of the wafer, as strain fields and process induced defects can localize the Fe impurities in this sensitive area. 6 It is well accepted that iron contamination degrades gate oxide integrity and decreases yield as devices are scaled to sub-micron dimensions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defects corresponding to D1 have often been observed by several investigators (19)(20)(21). Swanson (19) found that an unidentified donor with a level at E~ + 0.4 eV was produced by quenching from 800~176 and was annihilated near 300 K by first-order kinetics with an activation energy of 0.8 eV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In most cases, these impurities and defects affect the electrical properties of the crystals, and therefore have a significant effect on the performance of electronic devices. Although there have been a large number of experimental investigations (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13) to study the energy levels arising from these impurities and defects and their carrier trapping and emitting properties by means of capacitance transient techniques such as deep-level transient spectroscopy (DLTS) (14), relatively little work has been accomplished so far on the effects of such electrically active centers on the electrical properties of silicon crystals (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21). However, the results of such work would indeed be very helpful to design the optimum fabrication process of desirable devices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%