1990
DOI: 10.1109/25.54953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intersymbol interference reduction for differential MSK by nonredundant error correction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6. Block diagram of double-error correcting NEC receiver [11]. filter, and then transformed back to the time domain.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…6. Block diagram of double-error correcting NEC receiver [11]. filter, and then transformed back to the time domain.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore it was shown that the output error rate performance of the NEC receiver can be analytically determined by considering the input error patterns containing more errors than its error correction capability. However, unlike the AWGN considered in [8,9,11] or the static CCI environment considered in [12] where the interference is independent from symbol to symbol, fading affects several symbols consecutively thus creating correlation between these symbols. This correlation, which is governed by the fading autocorrelation function (see (7)), is the reason why the occurrence probability of each input pattern is different.…”
Section: System Model Description and Analysismentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of schemes have been exploited in the RF domain to bring the performance of differential receivers closer to coherent. One prominent scheme, involves the use of multiple delay-interferometers (DIs), with the outputs combined to extract more information from the transmitted signal than would be possible with a single DI [1][2][3]. The demodulated signals in the multiple DIs have partially uncorrelated noise, allowing for some error correction after suitable processing of the received information, without any increase in the rate at the transmitter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possibly more compelling, it has been shown that these techniques provide even more error correction gain in the non-back-to-back scenario. That is, these techniques provide compensation for transmission, transmitter and receiver impairments [1,3]. Recently multi-bit detection has been utilized in the optical domain to increase the back-to-back receiver sensitivity and to provide compensation for nonlinear phase noise (NLPN) and chromatic dispersion (CD) [4][5][6][7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%