2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c00207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intersystem Crossings in Late-Row Elements: A Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, we compared the results of the four-component and exact two-component (X2C) calculations. Recently, the X2C method has been shown to accurately model the X-ray absorption spectra and intersystem crossing transitions in molecules containing late-row elements. , In our study, we find that the energy gaps between the states calculated using the four- and two-component methods agree within 9 cm –1 (Table S3), indicating the high accuracy of the variational X2C method. We also compare the results of the variational SOC calculations with those obtained using the conventional perturbative SOC approach, as implemented in the GAMESS and OpenMolcas suite of programs.…”
supporting
confidence: 63%
“…In this work, we compared the results of the four-component and exact two-component (X2C) calculations. Recently, the X2C method has been shown to accurately model the X-ray absorption spectra and intersystem crossing transitions in molecules containing late-row elements. , In our study, we find that the energy gaps between the states calculated using the four- and two-component methods agree within 9 cm –1 (Table S3), indicating the high accuracy of the variational X2C method. We also compare the results of the variational SOC calculations with those obtained using the conventional perturbative SOC approach, as implemented in the GAMESS and OpenMolcas suite of programs.…”
supporting
confidence: 63%
“…The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacsau.2c00659. (2), where G is the spatial symmetry group of the molecule. States with large singlet-triplet mixing is written as a direct sum of the singlet and triplet irreducible representations.…”
Section: * Sı Supporting Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spin–orbit coupling (SOC) is a cornerstone of modern chemistry, responsible for important photochemical phenomena such as intersystem crossing, , relativistic spectroscopies (for example, L-edge X-ray absorption, magnetic circular dichroism), and fine-structure splitting . Taking advantage of spin-forbidden processes allowed by SOC has contributed to recent advances throughout chemistry and materials science, especially in LED and solar cell technology. , With growing popularity in exploring spin-forbidden processes and the ubiquity of nonmain group elements in modern chemistry, there is demand for an efficient SOC method suitable for atomically diverse and large systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonradiative intramolecular energy transfer (IET) process (also called antenna effect ) is broadly exploited to increase the brightness of luminescent metal complexes, in particular for trivalent lanthanide ions when, for example, these molecules are employed as optical probes for imaging and luminescent sensing. For such a class of compounds, brightness is defined as B = ε · ϕ ovl = ε · η sens · ϕ int , where ε is the molar absorption coefficient, ϕ ovl is the overall quantum yield, i.e., the ratio of emitting/absorbed photons by the matrix/ligand, η sens is the overall energy transfer efficiency, and ϕ int is the intrinsic quantum yield, i.e., the ratio of emitting/absorbed photons upon direct excitation into a luminescent level of the lanthanide ion. Thus, to obtain high values of brightness, the combination of high ε, η sens , and ϕ int values is required (η sens = η ISC · η IET ; where η ISC and η IET are the efficiency of the intersystem crossing (ISC) and the IET processes, respectively). In this direction, one should avoid nonradiative processes, which negatively impact the ϕ int value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%