2001
DOI: 10.1162/003465301750160009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intertemporal Choice and the Cross-Sectional Variance of Marginal Utility

Abstract: Abstract-The theory of intertemporal choice predicts that the crosssectional variance of the marginal utility of consumption is equal to its own lag plus a constant and a random component. Using general preference specifications and some assumptions about the nature of the random component, we provide an explicit test of this hypothesis. Our approach circumvents the necessity to identify a pure age profile of the crosssectional variance of consumption and yields a well-specified statistical test. This test is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This part of the paper follows and develops work by Deaton and Paxson (1994), Attanasio and Jappelli (2001) and Attanasio et al (2001a,b). In particular, we test the restrictions implied by full risk sharing on the evolution of the cross sectional variance of consumption.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This part of the paper follows and develops work by Deaton and Paxson (1994), Attanasio and Jappelli (2001) and Attanasio et al (2001a,b). In particular, we test the restrictions implied by full risk sharing on the evolution of the cross sectional variance of consumption.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…See also Attanasio and Jappelli (2001) and Jappelli and Pistaferri (2001). where the subscript g indicates the fact that the variance is computed within a group Taking first differences of equation (9) one gets:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that, given the income process and the sequence fq t g equations (7) and (8) de ne (even when a closed form solution does not exist), consumption. It is interesting to compare equation (8) for t = 1 with equation 3. In the complete market case, the agent has available a wide array of state contingent securities that are linked in an individual budget constraint that sums over time and across histories, as all trades can be made at time 1.…”
Section: Permanent Income (Self Insurance)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Recall conditions 7and (8) and the fact that there is a one-to-one onto mapping between x t and t histories in this model. 15 If we normalize asset holding to zero, we indeed have T = c T y T ; T 1 = c T 1 y T 1 ; and so on.…”
Section: The Ack Economy As a Foundation Of The Bewley Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the full information model satis es this conditions as well, and when preferences are separable c t has zero variance. The key distinguishing feature between this allocation and the permanent income model is the fact that the former does not satisfy the (NPVC) (8). That is, the intertemporal budget constraint based on that single asset is violated because it ignores the state contingent transfers implied by the constrained e cient equilibrium allocation.…”
Section: Moral Hazard With Hidden Asset Accumulationmentioning
confidence: 99%