2016
DOI: 10.1111/joes.12142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intertemporal Substitution in Consumption: A Literature Review

Abstract: Abstract. This paper reviews the status quo of the empirical literature about the elasticity of intertemporal substitution (EIS) in consumption. Aiming to answer the question what the true magnitude of the parameter really is, it discusses several recent advances of the theory and highlights challenges for the estimation. Although the general discussion still seems to be prevailed by Hall's early EIS estimates close to zero, we show that several deviations from the time-additive constant relative risk aversion… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 233 publications
(275 reference statements)
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 The estimation results for other speci…cations are available upon request. 2 4 This is robust even when we estimate our preferred model speci…cation allowing for indeterminacy with the technique ofBianchi and Nicolò (2017).2 5Lubik and Schorfheide (2007) estimate values for for Canada of 0:31 and 0:29 depending on their choice of priors, somewhat smaller than our estimate of 0:44 but well-within the range of values for that are consistent with the bulk of the empirical evidence(Havránek (2015),Thimme (2017)). …”
supporting
confidence: 67%
“…3 The estimation results for other speci…cations are available upon request. 2 4 This is robust even when we estimate our preferred model speci…cation allowing for indeterminacy with the technique ofBianchi and Nicolò (2017).2 5Lubik and Schorfheide (2007) estimate values for for Canada of 0:31 and 0:29 depending on their choice of priors, somewhat smaller than our estimate of 0:44 but well-within the range of values for that are consistent with the bulk of the empirical evidence(Havránek (2015),Thimme (2017)). …”
supporting
confidence: 67%
“…Our paper is also part of a growing literature that studies how disagreement impacts 11 Thimme (2016) provides a review of the literature on the EIS and discusses several recent advances of the theory and highlights estimation challenges since the early, close to zero, EIS estimates by Hall (1988). bond markets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in a model with Epstein-Zin preferences and consumption shocks, estimate an EIS of 1.5. Other estimates vary further(Havránek, 2015;Thimme, 2017), whileEpstein et al (2014) offers a potent critique by pointing to the sizeable magnitude of implied time premia by standard calibrations of Epstein-Zin utility specifications. Note that our calibrated EIS of 0.9 is belowBansal and Yaron's (2004), largely because their model assumes persistent shocks to consumption growth rates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%