2017
DOI: 10.1080/15427587.2017.1357038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intertextualizing interactive texts for critical thinking: A South Korean EFL experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If there were popular narratives in society, he would be skeptical and critical of narratives instead of believing the narratives with willingness. This is aligned with Chandrasoma and Ananda (2017), who proposed that intertextuality has several benefits such as the students' critical thinking can be improved, they can make critical stances, and develop critical expressions. From Raka's stories, it is proven that he could make a critical stance and develop critical expression because his critical thinking had been enhanced whenever he practiced his intertextuality.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…If there were popular narratives in society, he would be skeptical and critical of narratives instead of believing the narratives with willingness. This is aligned with Chandrasoma and Ananda (2017), who proposed that intertextuality has several benefits such as the students' critical thinking can be improved, they can make critical stances, and develop critical expressions. From Raka's stories, it is proven that he could make a critical stance and develop critical expression because his critical thinking had been enhanced whenever he practiced his intertextuality.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…This CSE activity provides several contexts for developing students' critical thinking paving the way for making critical judgements (Chandrasoma & Ananda, 2018; Ennis, 1996; Fisher, 2001). For example, dumping of contaminated industrial waste on one side of the canal is an ideal context.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study suggests that teachers use the existing GBP to introduce critical pedagogy principles. Different from previous studies in critical pedagogy and language teaching that mainly focus on incorporating critical pedagogy (see Mambu, 2018;Yulianto, 2020;Kurniawati et al, 2020;Chandrasoma & Ananda, 2018), this current study successfully intersected the two teaching approaches of critical pedagogy and genre pedagogy. Hence, rather than composing a specific method of teaching critical pedagogy, this study embeds the paradigm in the more 'fixed method' of genre pedagogy.…”
Section: Back and Forwardmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…When incorporating critical pedagogy in EFL classes, published studies that examined critical pedagogy and EFL teaching are mostly limited to research about teachers' reflections and teachers' difficulties (Mambu, 2018;Chandrasoma & Ananda, 2018). Regarding skills to improve, research in this field has proven that critical pedagogy improves reading skills (Kurniawati et al, 2020) and speaking skills (Chandrasoma & Ananda, 2018). Despite the contribution, none of these studies focused on developing students' writing skills.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%