1969
DOI: 10.3758/bf03336543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intertrial reward (ITR) and delay of reward: Effects on resistance to extinction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1971
1971
1972
1972

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lobb and Runcie (1967) found that intertrial reinforcements were effective in reducing resistance to extinction if given 15 seconds but not 1 hour after the alley trial. However, Overstreet and Campbell (1969) found that they were not effective if given 15 seconds but were if given 30 seconds after the alley trial.…”
Section: Extinction Effectmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Lobb and Runcie (1967) found that intertrial reinforcements were effective in reducing resistance to extinction if given 15 seconds but not 1 hour after the alley trial. However, Overstreet and Campbell (1969) found that they were not effective if given 15 seconds but were if given 30 seconds after the alley trial.…”
Section: Extinction Effectmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Within the aftereffects framework, at least three experimental operations suffice to appropriately modify the N-length stimulus. The presentation of reward, nonreward followed by placement of the subject in a baited goal box (ITR), and delay of reward (Capaldi, Hart, & Stanley, 1963;Capaldi & Olivier, 1967;Overstreet & Campbell, 1969) might all be used for this purpose. Hence, two N-length values are factorially manipulated from preshift to postshift training for reward, ITR, and delay of reward conditions.…”
Section: Reward-and Nonreward-produced Stimuli and Performance To Pat...mentioning
confidence: 99%