1993
DOI: 10.1016/0165-4896(93)90022-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interval choice: classic and general cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this interpretation is necessarily but not sufficiently applicable to the bounded real interval representations, since many numerical representational forms have been examined in which the size of a threshold may depend not only on target objects but also on objects under comparison (see, for example, Abbas & Vincke, 1993;Agoev & Aleskerov, 1993;Nakamura, 1990Nakamura, , 2000Rodriguez-Palmero, 1997; and many others).…”
Section: F(a) … G(x)mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, this interpretation is necessarily but not sufficiently applicable to the bounded real interval representations, since many numerical representational forms have been examined in which the size of a threshold may depend not only on target objects but also on objects under comparison (see, for example, Abbas & Vincke, 1993;Agoev & Aleskerov, 1993;Nakamura, 1990Nakamura, , 2000Rodriguez-Palmero, 1997; and many others).…”
Section: F(a) … G(x)mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…(This numerical representation is a particular case of the general numerical representation due to Abbas and Vincke (1993) where the function Q is the mutual indifference threshold; the present representation was obtained independently by Agaev and Aleskerov (1993) and Abbas (1994). )…”
Section: Additional Interpretative Elementsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…That means that for the decreasing sequence (3 + 1 n ) n∈N that converges to 3 in R -but it converges to 2 in S 2 endowed with the order topology τ < -, the image sequence (g(3 + 1 n )) n∈N converges to g (2). Since g is also defined on S 1 and it is increasing, it implies that g(x) = g (2) for any x ∈ [2,3]. Therefore, for this example the function g can never be strictly increasing while removing the gap (2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The reason is that, if the function g would remove the gaps of S 1 and S 2 , in particular it would remove the gap (2,3] of S 2 . That means that for the decreasing sequence (3 + 1 n ) n∈N that converges to 3 in R -but it converges to 2 in S 2 endowed with the order topology τ < -, the image sequence (g(3 + 1 n )) n∈N converges to g (2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%