2000
DOI: 10.1002/1098-2388(200007/08)19:1<49::aid-ssu8>3.0.co;2-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interval debulking surgery: An alternative for primary surgical debulking?

Abstract: Retrospective analyses suggest that a subgroup of patients with Stage III and IV ovarian carcinoma can be treated with neo‐adjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery. The absolute indications for neo‐adjuvant chemotherapy appear to be Stage IV disease (excluding pleural fluid) or metastases of more than 1 g at sites where resection is impossible. In patients with an estimated total metastatic tumor load of >100 g, the presence of at least two of the following relative indications for neo‐adju… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of evidence to date of the superiority of neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with conventional therapy could be because of an inadequate patient selection in these studies. In studies by Schwartz et al and Vergote et al, all patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, including those patients whose tumors could have been resected free of macroscopic residual tumor and who thus would have had good median survival11, 19 regardless. For these patients, additional improvement of these already relatively favorable therapy results due to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not very likely, so that any possible advantage of neoadjuvant chemotherapy becomes very difficult to prove within the group of patients with potentially completely resectable tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of evidence to date of the superiority of neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with conventional therapy could be because of an inadequate patient selection in these studies. In studies by Schwartz et al and Vergote et al, all patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, including those patients whose tumors could have been resected free of macroscopic residual tumor and who thus would have had good median survival11, 19 regardless. For these patients, additional improvement of these already relatively favorable therapy results due to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not very likely, so that any possible advantage of neoadjuvant chemotherapy becomes very difficult to prove within the group of patients with potentially completely resectable tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is partly dependent on surgical experience. In fact, trials have shown that the rates of optimal PDS in small centres are around 20–30% compared with 60–90% in highly specialized gynaecological oncology centres [ 9 ]. Patient characteristics also influence resectability of widespread disease [ 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resultados similares foram observados por Mohamed et al 11 sinalizando que a citorredução de intervalo após quimioterapia neo-adjuvante, deva ser realizada quando existe a possibilidade de um procedimento alargado com múltiplas ressecções e anastomoses para se atingir uma citorredução ótima. As complicações maiores dessa série como abscessos intra-cavitários devido às fístulas tanto de anastomose colorretal quanto de intestino delgado, também têm sido descritas por outros autores quando se trata de citorredução ótima com ressecções multiviscerais.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…10 Como alternativa estratégica, com o objetivo de se evitar cirurgias multiviscerais, a utilização da quimioterapia neoadjuvante tem sido recomendada em associação a citorredução de intervalo. [11][12] Embora existam poucas séries descritas na literatura sobre o uso dessa operação no tratamento do câncer de ovário, especificamente no Brasil não encontramos nenhuma.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified