2007 IEEE International Fuzzy Systems Conference 2007
DOI: 10.1109/fuzzy.2007.4295537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interval-Valued and Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets: A Subjective Comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For computational reasons, most practical applications of Type-2 fuzzy sets are indeed only concerned with the subclass of interval Type-2 fuzzy sets [52,53,84]. For most authors interval Type-2 fuzzy sets and intervalvalued fuzzy sets (IVFSs) [34,42,66,89] are two equivalent concepts although there are some conceptual differences regarding notions such as cardinality and support of interval Type-2 fuzzy sets and interval-valued fuzzy sets [60]. Recall that an interval-valued fuzzy set corresponds to a map-ping A from X into the class of intervals [µ 1 , µ 2 ] ⊆ [0, 1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For computational reasons, most practical applications of Type-2 fuzzy sets are indeed only concerned with the subclass of interval Type-2 fuzzy sets [52,53,84]. For most authors interval Type-2 fuzzy sets and intervalvalued fuzzy sets (IVFSs) [34,42,66,89] are two equivalent concepts although there are some conceptual differences regarding notions such as cardinality and support of interval Type-2 fuzzy sets and interval-valued fuzzy sets [60]. Recall that an interval-valued fuzzy set corresponds to a map-ping A from X into the class of intervals [µ 1 , µ 2 ] ⊆ [0, 1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the linguistic summarizers are labeled with IT2FSs, the quantifier and the qualifier are labeled with T1FSs, then type-I quantified sentence becomes "Q Y s are/ haveS I [T ]" and type-II quantified sentence becomes "Q S g Y s are/ haveS I [T ]". Niewiadomski [64], [65] extended the scalar cardinality based degree of truth proposed by Zadeh [3] to IT2F environment for evaluating linguistic summaries for the both cases.…”
Section: B Linguistic Summarization With Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets:mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Niewiadomski [64], [65] stated that at least one of Q and S should be labeled with a T1FS in linguistic summarization, and the degree of truth is equal to an interval value. When the quantifier is labeled with an IT2FS and the summarizers are labeled with T1FSs, type-I quantified sentence becomes "Q I Y s are/ have S [T ]" and type-II quantified sentence becomes "Q I S g Y s are/ have S [T ]".…”
Section: B Linguistic Summarization With Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets:mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, Niewiadomski [48] presented a comparison analysis between the IT2FSs and IVFSs, the conclusion shows the fact that IVFSs and IT2FSs are not fully equivalent, despite the numerous similarities between them. For example, the cardinality of the IVFSs is an interval number, while the cardinality of the IT2FSs is a real number.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%