2021
DOI: 10.1007/s13369-020-05313-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interval-Valued Picture Uncertain Linguistic Generalized Hamacher Aggregation Operators and Their Application in Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Step 1: Compute the decision matrix; see Table 1. Further, normalize the matrix if the matrix covers cost type of information, such as which were proposed by Garg et al (2021) and Yager (2008), have not been working effectively because these are the special cases of the initiated techniques. Hence, thewhihc initiated techniques are novel and superior than existing information.…”
Section: Analysis Of Digital Green Innovation Based On Proposed Suppl...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Step 1: Compute the decision matrix; see Table 1. Further, normalize the matrix if the matrix covers cost type of information, such as which were proposed by Garg et al (2021) and Yager (2008), have not been working effectively because these are the special cases of the initiated techniques. Hence, thewhihc initiated techniques are novel and superior than existing information.…”
Section: Analysis Of Digital Green Innovation Based On Proposed Suppl...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, Jabeen et al (2023) exposed the Aczel-Alsina operators for IVPFSs. Further, Garg et al (2021) initiated the interval-valued picture of uncertain linguistic generalized Hamacher operators and their application in decision support systems. Further, the prioritized operators based on classical set theory were proposed by Yager (2008).…”
Section: Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PFS not only includes the degree of nonmembership but also allows the DM more flexibility and granularity in the analysis of imprecise information by incorporating the degree of neutrality and refusal [29]. Over the years, there have been a substantial number of further extensions of PFS with generalized PF soft set [30], weighted geometric aggregation operators with t-norm and t-conorm [31], interval-valued picture uncertain linguistic set with generalized Hamacher aggregation operators [32], simple to understand and flexible distance-like measures, such as weak interval-valued pseudo-metrics [33] and Dempster-Shafer theory [34], which improved the actual score measures [35], and trapezoidal PFN with Dijkstra algorithm [36] to mention a few. In this context, it is noteworthy to compare PFS with another recently developed and popular variant of classical FS, namely the spherical fuzzy set (SFS) [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sitara et al [19] proposed novel decision-making analysis based on q-rung picture fuzzy graph structures. Garg [20,21] developed MAGDM process based on operators for intuitionistic multiplicative set and interval-valued picture uncertain linguistic generalized Hamacher aggregation operators. Liu et al [22] proposed group decision-making using complex q-ROF Bonferroni mean.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%