1996
DOI: 10.1016/0165-0114(95)00167-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interval valued strict preference with Zadeh triples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Grattan [10] had come to this conclusion that the presentation of a linguistic expression in the form of fuzzy sets is not enough for true decision making all the times. Later, Gorzaczany [11] and Turksen [12] have proposed the interval-valued fuzzy sets that can be used instead. Wang and Li [13] defined interval-valued fuzzy numbers and gave their extended operations.…”
Section: It Allows the Straight Linguistic Definition Of Weights Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Grattan [10] had come to this conclusion that the presentation of a linguistic expression in the form of fuzzy sets is not enough for true decision making all the times. Later, Gorzaczany [11] and Turksen [12] have proposed the interval-valued fuzzy sets that can be used instead. Wang and Li [13] defined interval-valued fuzzy numbers and gave their extended operations.…”
Section: It Allows the Straight Linguistic Definition Of Weights Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is mainly because human judgment and preference are often ambiguous and cannot be estimated with exact numerical values (Chen [ [58] for the CLINAID system, Gorzaczany [11] in approximate reasoning, Turksen [59] and [60]) in interval-valued logic and in preference modeling [12]. Based upon the definition of the interval-valued fuzzy set in 1986, an interval-valued fuzzy set A defined on (−∞, +∞) is given as: …”
Section: Interval Values Fuzzy Topsismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximate reasoning is, formally speaking, as Turksen says [110], the process or processes by which a possible imprecise conclusion is deduced from a collection of imprecise premises. In this section, we present a short review of the inference methods most commonly used in the literature when the imprecise premises and the imprecise conclusions are represented using IVFSs.…”
Section: Approximate Reasoningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…}U; |HQ=N w |rN=O u}t -=D |xQ}HvR |=ylU}Q |@=} RQ= |= Q@ p=tDL= Q}F -=D T} QD=t C} Q}Ot |= Q@ K}LY OOa |R}Qxt=vQ@ pOt l} |RtQ w |R}Q@D [6] "OvOQm xO=iDU= T} wmQwm [7] "OvOQm x=Q= u}t -=D |xQ}HvR |=yxm@W |L=Q] QO u}t -=D |xQ}HvR lU} Q [8] "OvOQm xO=iDU= u}t -=D |xQ}HvR lU} Q |@=} RQ= |= Q@ FMEA VwQ R= u= Q=mty w xO=iDU= u}t -=D |xQ}HvR lU} Q |@=} RQ= |= Q@ |R=i AHP VwQ R= u= Q=mty w qovt [9] "OvOQm u=oOvvmu}t -=D ?=NDv= |xv}tR QO xOW s=Hv= C=ar=]t "2"2 u=oOvvmu}t -=D ?=NDv= 'OQ}o|t CQwY =yXN=W |QUm} |=v@tQ@ |Q}os}tYD "OQ}o CQwY XN=W |QUm} |=v@t Q@ O}=@ w &CU= |Q}os}tYD`wv l} R}v w |@=} RQ= |= Q@ = Q |}=yQ=}at xOvvmu}t -=D ?=NDv= xv}tR QO xOW s=Hv= C=ar=]t pt=W |rm Q=}at Q=yJ uwUm}O %p=Ft u=wvax@ 'OvDiQo Q_v QO u=oOvvmu}t -=D ?=NDv= |iQat u=oOvvmu}t -=D ?=NDv= |= Q@ |Dv=Q=o |=yCU=}U '|Q}PBp}wLDC}r@=k 'C}i}m 'Ct}k Q=}at xU |wQ u=WC=k}kLD QO u= Q=mty w ww=}r w u= Q=mty w =} R [10] [3] "Ovm ltm Q= Qk Q_v Ot |v=QL@ lU} Q |=yXN=W u}}aD w |Ov@x@DQ QO lU} Q |=yXN=W VwQ 'Ov=xDU@=w Qo}Om} x@ u=oOvvmu}t -=D lU} Q |=yXN=W xm =Hv; R= [1] "OQ}o|tv |Ov@x@DQ w |@=} RQ= |@ wNx@ = Q u=oOvvmu}t -=D |=ylU}Q Ov=wD|tv |DvU FMEA "Ovm|t x@re Xkv u}= Q@ 'ANP VwQ =@ VwQ u}= ? }mQD =@ |O=yvW}B pOt "Ovm QO p}rOx@ xm CU= xQ=}atOvJ |Q}os}tYD |=yl}vmD R= |m} T}UB=D VwQ |oO=U u}vJty '|ivt p;xO}= pL x= Q w C@Ft p;xO}= pL x= Q u=tRsy uDiQo Q_v T}UB=D VwQ [2] [17] 'xOWu=}@h}Q=aD|=v@tQ@ %OwW|t h} QaD u}vJ [14] "OvOwtv xO=iDU= lU} Q pt=wa x@ xHwD =@ |v=yH xOvvmu}t -=D ?=NDv= xrUt '|QDw}Bt=m C=a]k S=Dvwt CmQW l} u=oOvvmu}t -=D ?=NDv= w |@=} RQ= |= Q@ u= Q=mty w x=Q= u=oOvvmu}t -=D lU} Q |=yXN=W uDiQo Q_v QO =@ = Q |R=i ANP VwQ l} lU} Q \}=QW CLD u=oOvvmu}t -=D ?=NDv= w |@=} RQ= x@ u= Q=mty w =} R [15] "OvO=O pOt l} =yu; "OvDN=OQB u=oOvvmu}t -=D |D=}rta lU} Q pt=wa uDiQo Q_v QO =@ |R=i |=yxawtHt pOt w 9 FCM |R=i |DN=vW |=yxWkv R= |@}mQD pt=W ?=NDv= xv}tR QO ww w uJ [16] "OvOQm x=Q= u=oOvvmu}t -=D ?=NDv= xrUt pL |= Q@ u}= QO xm OvO=O x=Q= xOWKqY= FMEA pOt l} lU} Q \}=QW QO u=oOvvmu}t -=D R= nv=R w |r [1] "CU= xOW x@U=Lt AHP VwQ R= xO=iDU= =@ =yQ=}at uRw VwQ xO=iDU= |v=yH u}t -=D |xQ}HvR QO u=oOvvmu}t -=D lU} Q |@=} RQ= QO FMEA VwQ [3] "OvOQm |}xR=@ |R=i C}a]ksOa "3"2 xO=iDU= [18] uUmQ=D w [17] |vWrRQwo \UwD Q=@ u}rw= |= Q@ |R=i |=yxawtHt pOt u}= R= xO=iDU= |= Q@ |r}qO pOvt w l}vQ=m w [19] u= Q=mty w T}rvQwm u}vJty "OW |}=v=wD sOa Q@ |r}qO u}vJty w |v=@ R |=yQ}eDt C}a]ksOa Q@ x@re |= Q@ O=Oa= nv=w [20] "OvOQm x=Q= |v=@ R |=yQ}eDt C}a]ksOa Q@ x@re |= Q@ |rwtat |R=i O=Oa= =yu; x@ \w@Qt |[=} Q C=}rta w OvOQm x=Q= |}xR=@ |R=i O=Oa= |= Q@ = Q |i} Q=aD |r w O=Oa= xawtHt R= xO=iDU= =@ = Q T}UB=D pOt u= Q=mty w |v=}DW; [21] "OvO=O xaUwD = Q O=Oa= xO=iDU= =@ = Q Qwm}w VwQ u= Q=mty w |O}Lw …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%