2016
DOI: 10.15714/scandpsychol.3.e10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intervention to reduce procrastination in first-year students: Preliminary results from a Norwegian study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants were students ( N = 140, 110 females) at an introductory course in psychology, recruited as part of an examination of procrastination instruments for an intervention study on procrastination ( Nordby et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Study 2bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were students ( N = 140, 110 females) at an introductory course in psychology, recruited as part of an examination of procrastination instruments for an intervention study on procrastination ( Nordby et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Study 2bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure shows the flow of the search process. We excluded four articles because they lacked a control group (e.g., Nordby et al, ). We excluded one article because it had no valid measure of procrastination (Cadena, Schoar, Cristea, & Delgado‐Medrano, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some procrastination intervention studies have used within‐group methodologies and assessed procrastination pre‐ and postintervention, with no comparison to a control group (e.g., Nordby, Wang, Dahl, & Svartdal, ). Other studies have used quasi‐analytic designs with comparison groups but no random assignment to groups (e.g., Peper, Harvey, Lin, & Duvvuri, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%