2017
DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2017/25226.10305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interventional Angiography: Radiation Protection for the Examiner by using Lead-free Gloves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[8][9][10][11] In this case, we did not utilize radioprotective gloves during the embolization, but this is a point for future consideration and an area of ongoing research. 12 Direct puncture of a scalp AVF for liquid embolic agent injection along with external compression of the superficial temporal artery to perform a "manual pressure-cooker technique" is a novel minimally invasive technique that can result in an excellent clinical and radiographic outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[8][9][10][11] In this case, we did not utilize radioprotective gloves during the embolization, but this is a point for future consideration and an area of ongoing research. 12 Direct puncture of a scalp AVF for liquid embolic agent injection along with external compression of the superficial temporal artery to perform a "manual pressure-cooker technique" is a novel minimally invasive technique that can result in an excellent clinical and radiographic outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The endovascular pressure-cooker technique is well described from the arterial and venous sides, as well as with retrograde approaches [ 8 - 11 ]. In this case, we did not utilize radioprotective gloves during the embolization, but this is a point for future consideration and an area of ongoing research [ 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researchers determined that wearing protective gloves would substantially decrease the radiation dose for the HCW 10 . Although protective gloves used during procedures requiring radiation may contain lead, researchers continue to explore the protective properties of lead‐free materials that also may provide protection for the wearer, remain flexible, and avoid diminishing the wearer’s sense of touch during sterile procedures 11 …”
Section: Strategies For Successmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A current phantom study was able to show that a reduction of the equivalent dose of 42.6 % can be achieved by using radiation protection gloves consisting of rubber and metal oxides (e. g. bismuth) with almost the same comfort level as conventional gloves. However, use of these gloves in the primary beam results in an increase in the equivalent dose for the hands of 64.5 % [48]. To avoid this risk, tools such as needle holders are regularly used.…”
Section: Radiation Protection Glovesmentioning
confidence: 99%