2018
DOI: 10.1080/1059924x.2018.1536573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interventions Addressing Injury among Agricultural Workers: A Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the agricultural industry not all farm owners employ workers. Many farmers work as operators, decision-makers, and workers at the same time (13). Farm injuries are prevalent in males (14), and in our study we similarly observed a higher rate of injury in men, except for cattle-related injuries, which were significantly more common in women.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In the agricultural industry not all farm owners employ workers. Many farmers work as operators, decision-makers, and workers at the same time (13). Farm injuries are prevalent in males (14), and in our study we similarly observed a higher rate of injury in men, except for cattle-related injuries, which were significantly more common in women.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Employers may be able to prevent and/or reduce musculoskeletal injuries to workers by offering frequent rest breaks, 19 stretching, 20 job rotation, 21 and providing better tools and resources. 22,23 However, as undocumented workers, it is highly unlikely that these workers would voice concern over work-related pain to their employer, primarily to maintain their anonymity. 24,25 Insect bites (86.0 percent), physical exhaustion (46.7 percent), and headache (33.9 percent) were the most commonly reported environmental exposure and health symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Health systems are different in each country. The differences in the treatment of occupational ailments distort occupational risk prevention systems (India, Australia, Finland, Italy, South Korea, USA, France, Canada and the Netherlands) [81,141,175,[184][185][186][187][188][189][190][191][192][193][194][195][196][197][198][199]. Preventive measures, the type of crop and the permissiveness of the authorities are factors that affect this distortion (USA and Europe) [95,147,200].…”
Section: Msd Studies In Agriculturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comprehensive health surveillance systems would be successful in creating and exchanging ergonomic information in the agricultural sector (Australia) [192]. An analysis of 479 scientific articles showed the moderate efficacy of prevention programmes aimed at agricultural workers (USA) [193].…”
Section: Developed Countriesmentioning
confidence: 99%