Interventions designed to reduce implicit prejudices and implicit stereotypes in real world contexts: a systematic review

Abstract

Background Implicit biases are present in the general population and among professionals in various domains, where they can lead to discrimination. Many interventions are used to reduce implicit bias. However, uncertainties remain as to their effectiveness. Methods We conducted a systematic review by searching ERIC, PUBMED and PSYCHINFO for peer-reviewed studies conducted on adults between May 2005 and April 2015, testing interventions designed to reduce implicit bias, with results measured using the Implicit Association Test (IAT) or sufficiently similar methods. Results 30 articles were identified as eligible. Some techniques, such as engaging with others’ perspective, appear unfruitful, at least in short term implicit bias reduction, while other techniques, such as exposure to counterstereotypical exemplars, are more promising. Robust data is lacking for many of these interventions. Conclusions Caution is thus advised when it comes to programs aiming at reducing biases. This does not weaken the case for implementing widespread structural and institutional changes that are multiply justified. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s40359-019-0299-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Do Racial Stereotypes Contribute to Medical Misdiagnosis of Child Abuse?

“…The fact that we found effects on our participants' information-processing but not decisionmaking is consistent with prior work suggesting that many medical practitioners are already aware of the need to ensure that bias does not contaminate their judgments (Green et al, 2007;Tsai & Michelson, 2017). In fact, bias training and other interventions designed to enhance racial sensitivity appear to be prevalent in hospitals throughout the United States (e.g., Tsai & Michelson, 2017) and evidence suggests they can be effective (e.g., Devine et al, 2012;FitzGerald et al, 2019;Zeidan et al, 2019). Our findings suggest that it might be beneficial to expand existing training to address the potential for racial bias in the context of child abuse cases.…”

Addressing Racial Biases in Medicine: A Review of the Literature, Critique, and Recommendations

“…A recent systematic review of the literature 151 examined techniques to reduce implicit bias and agreed with prior reviews about the ineffectiveness of many such programs, while suggesting that the use of counter-stereotypical exemplars might be promising. How many of those exemplars come from within the medical school faculty?…”

Advancing health equity through CTSA programs: Opportunities for interaction between health equity, dissemination and implementation, and translational science

“…Over the years, several personal-, inter-personal-, and structural-level interventions have been developed and tested to address health disparities, and there is a widespread call for innovative EBIs. Examples of interventions at personal and inter-personal levels include exposure to counter-stereotypical exemplars to overcome implicit biases in health professionals [29], and stigma reduction and management [30,31], which have shown some evidence of effectiveness. Structural interventions that aim to change the physical and built environments (such as housing mobility interventions [32]), sociocultural determinants, and multiple levels of influences [33] are complex and more difficult to assess [34] but still show promise in addressing health inequities.…”