Interventions for promoting physical activity

Abstract

Background Little is known about the effectiveness of strategies to enable people to achieve and maintain recommended levels of physical activity. Objectives To assess the effectiveness of interventions designed to promote physical activity in adults aged 16 years and older, not living in an institution. Search methods We searched The Cochrane Library (issue 1 2005), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycLIT, BIDS ISI, SPORTDISCUS, SIGLE, SCISEARCH (from earliest dates available to December 2004). Reference lists of relevant articles were checked. No language restrictions were applied. Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials that compared different interventions to encourage sedentary adults not living in an institution to become physically active. Studies required a minimum of six months follow up from the start of the intervention to the collection of final data and either used an intention-to-treat analysis or, failing that, had no more than 20% loss to follow up. Data collection and analysis At least two reviewers independently assessed each study quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information where necessary. Standardised mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for continuous measures of self-reported physical activity and cardio-respiratory fitness. For studies with dichotomous outcomes, odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Main results The effect of interventions on self-reported physical activity (19 studies; 7598 participants) was positive and moderate (pooled SMD random effects model 0.28 95% CI 0.15 to 0.41) as was the effect of interventions (11 studies; 2195 participants) on cardio-respiratory fitness (pooled SMD random effects model 0.52 95% CI 0.14 to 0.90). There was significant heterogeneity in the reported effects as well as heterogeneity in characteristics of the interventions. The heterogeneity in reported effects was reduced in higher quality studies, when physical activity was self-directed with some professional guidance and when there was on-going professional support. Authors’ conclusions Our review suggests that physical activity interventions have a moderate effect on self-reported physical activity, on achieving a predetermined level of physical activity and cardio-respiratory fitness. Due to the clinical and statistical heterogeneity of the studies, only limited conclusions can be drawn about the effectiveness of individual components of the interventions. Future studies should provide greater detail of the components of interventions.

Reviewing and interpreting the effects of brief alcohol interventions: comment on a Cochrane review about motivational interviewing for young adults

“…We encourage Cochrane to evaluate whether formal inclusion of performance bias is appropriate for behavioral intervention trials, or make the distinction between ‘lack of blinding’ providers and participants and ‘inability to blind’ them. This precedent has been set by other Cochrane reviews on health behaviors 26, 27, although criteria alternative to blinding are needed to judge performance bias in this area, rather than not judging studies by this risk of bias at all 28. It is worth emphasizing, however, that blinding of outcome assessors is encouraged in behavioral intervention trials, especially given that subjective outcome measures are used prevalently in this area of research 25.…”

Exergames For Elderly: Social exergames to persuade seniors to increase physical activity

“…Lack of physical activity is related with obesity, cardiac problems, cancer, etc [1]. It is affecting all age groups, including the elderly.…”

Effects of dynamic workstation Oxidesk on acceptance, physical activity, mental fitness and work performance

“…During the last use this increased was not measured. One explanation could be a certain habituation to the exercise and acceptance of some discomfort related to the physical activity, which was shown in other studies [11,12]. Another possible explanation was that the first use was more intense in contrast to the original office chair, as they had no previous experience with dynamic workstations.…”