Interventions for treating traumatised permanent front teeth: luxated (dislodged) teeth

Belmonte, Flavia Monari; Macedo, Cristiane R; Day, Peter; Saconato, Humberto; Trevisani, Virgínia Fernandes Moça

doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006203.pub2

Cited by 16 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…10 Randomization is difficult to perform in dental trauma studies due to its low incidence, emergency nature, and the fact that it requires a multi-professional treatment approach in many cases. 21,28 The absence of randomization in these studies elicits other problems. The protocols differed not only from one study to another, but also, and without explanation, within the same study, where a treatment group that should have been homogeneous was not.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Treatments for intrusive luxation in permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Costa

Ribeiro

Cantanhede

et al. 2017

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Treatments for intrusive luxation in permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Costa

Ribeiro

Cantanhede

et al. 2017

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…This highlights the need for consensus on the minimum period of follow up for TDI. The two Cochrane reviews in dental traumatology have identified that for periodontal healing, this period should be a minimum of 12 months (1,14). This time period, however, is too short to collect robust data for outcomes such as tooth loss (24).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Arrangements were made to translate and assess studies that were not published in English (13). One of the authors (PD) has been involved with a number of Cochrane reviews, and research papers translated for these reviews were also used where appropriate in this publication (1,14).…”

Section: Languagementioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review of outcome measures used in clinical trials of treatment interventions following traumatic dental injuries

Sharif

Tejani-Sharif

Kenny

et al. 2015

Dental Traumatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

-Background: Traumatic dental injuries (TDI) are common, and appropriate treatment will maximize the chances of maintaining teeth in function while safeguarding their longevity and aesthetics. Subjectively, it appears that outcome measures used in studies investigating TDI are numerous and diverse. Objectives: To undertake a systematic review of the outcomes used in clinical trials of treatment interventions following TDI. Data sources: The MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and EMBASE databases were searched up to June 2014. Reference lists of eligible studies were cross-checked to identify additional studies and strategies to identify grey literature and ongoing trials were employed. Study selection: Two authors independently assessed studies for inclusion and undertook data extraction. The study designs included were as follows: systematic reviews with/without meta-analyses, randomized and pseudo-randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials. There were no language restrictions. Results: Ten studies confined to two types of TDI were included: avulsion (5) and non-vital immature permanent incisor teeth (5). The outcomes reported predominantly concentrated on injury activity and the physical consequence of injury. There was little consistency between studies for the length of follow up, the time points at which outcomes were evaluated or the methods used to measure them. Conclusions: There is significant heterogeneity in outcomes reported for TDI in the literature. These findings preclude meaningful meta-analysis between studies. Future clinical studies need to consider collecting a more consistent and wider range of outcomes, which should include one or more from each of the following domains: health resources utilisation, adverse effects and quality of life and family outcome. There is a clear need for the development of a Core Outcome Set for TDI using robust and established methodology, thus optimizing the value of future research.

show abstract

“…Dabei sollte die Reposition langsam erfolgen, um keine iatrogene Wurzelfraktur zu verursachen [6]. Die optimale Versorgung intrudierter Zähne hingegen ist umstritten.…”

Section: Luxationsverletzungen Und Avulsionunclassified

Zahntraumata

Brüllmann

dʼHoedt

2017

MKG-Chirurg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Interventions for treating traumatised permanent front teeth: luxated (dislodged) teeth

Abstract: Interventions for treating traumatised permanent front teeth: luxated (dislodged) teeth.

Cited by 16 publications

References 33 publications

Treatments for intrusive luxation in permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Treatments for intrusive luxation in permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis

A systematic review of outcome measures used in clinical trials of treatment interventions following traumatic dental injuries

Zahntraumata

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About