2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-01564-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interventions to improve appropriate antibiotic prescribing in long-term care facilities: a systematic review

Abstract: Background: Overuse of antibiotics has contributed to antimicrobial resistance; a growing public health threat. In long-term care facilities, levels of inappropriate prescribing are as high as 75%. Numerous interventions targeting long-term care facilities' antimicrobial stewardship have been reported with varying, and largely unexplained, effects. Therefore, this review aimed to apply behavioural science frameworks to specify the component behaviour change techniques of stewardship interventions in long-term … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The feedback should be clear and accurate but nonjudgemental. Providing feedback on performance or outcome of behaviour has been linked to larger effects in various interventions to change behaviour, for example, reductions in alcohol consumption (Black et al, 2016), overweight adolescents physical activity and healthy eating change (Samdal et al, 2017), and reducing inappropriate antibiotic prescribing (Crayton et al, 2020). Some research indicates that it is feeling good rather than bad about the progress that produces stronger motivation (J. P. Reynolds et al, 2018), thus supporting SDT's assumption of the importance for fostering the sense of competence, by providing encouraging feedback (i.e., celebrating even small successes, rather than scolding people for not progressing enough).…”
Section: Provide Constructive Clear and Relevant Feedback On How Sumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feedback should be clear and accurate but nonjudgemental. Providing feedback on performance or outcome of behaviour has been linked to larger effects in various interventions to change behaviour, for example, reductions in alcohol consumption (Black et al, 2016), overweight adolescents physical activity and healthy eating change (Samdal et al, 2017), and reducing inappropriate antibiotic prescribing (Crayton et al, 2020). Some research indicates that it is feeling good rather than bad about the progress that produces stronger motivation (J. P. Reynolds et al, 2018), thus supporting SDT's assumption of the importance for fostering the sense of competence, by providing encouraging feedback (i.e., celebrating even small successes, rather than scolding people for not progressing enough).…”
Section: Provide Constructive Clear and Relevant Feedback On How Sumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License Bangladesh and Nigeria (3.16). 12 However, these results were less than the studies carried out in Ghana (4.8 ≃ 5), Nigeria (6.1) 13 and Nepal (9.8 ≃ 10). 14…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Furthermore, detailing the context for interventions implementation helps to clarify how it affects interventions effectiveness. The "Action, actor, context, target, time (AACTT)" framework [17] proposes five domains to describe interventions [16,18].…”
Section: J O U R N a L P R E -P R O O Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, interventions to change healthcare professionals' behaviours can be characterized with nine functions from the "Behaviour Change Wheel" (BCW) [15]. This classification has already been used [7,16] to better describe AMS activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%