2016
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interventions to improve physical activity during pregnancy: a systematic review on issues of internal and external validity using the REAIM framework

Abstract: The systematic review highlights the under-reporting of contextual factors in studies of physical activity during pregnancy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…representativeness of participants, description of settings and staff, intervention delity). This is consistent with previous reviews of health interventions across a variety of populations [30,32,[50][51][52]. Of note was the level of reporting on Adoption, with indicators at the staff and setting level amongst the lowest reported.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…representativeness of participants, description of settings and staff, intervention delity). This is consistent with previous reviews of health interventions across a variety of populations [30,32,[50][51][52]. Of note was the level of reporting on Adoption, with indicators at the staff and setting level amongst the lowest reported.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…More specifically, the framework focuses on the reporting of the following five dimensions: (1) the reach into the target population and representativeness of the study sample; (2) efficacy or effectiveness of the intervention on primary outcome(s) tested under either restricted or controlled or real-world conditions, quality of life, and avoidance of unintended or negative consequences; (3) adoption rates of organizations and staff that would use the intervention and the characteristics of those organizations and staff; (4) implementation of the intervention as intended; and (5) maintenance of the effects at the individual level and sustainability of the intervention at an organizational or delivery level (RE-AIM: reach, efficacy/effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance). The RE-AIM framework has been used to review the literature in diverse health areas, such as physical activity during pregnancy [27] or among family caregivers [28], self-management programs for diabetes [29,30], and health literacy interventions [31]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, the framework focuses on the reporting of five dimensions, (1) the reach into the target population and representativeness of the study sample; (2) efficacy/effectiveness of the intervention on primary outcome(s) tested under either restricted/controlled or real-world conditions quality of life, and avoidance of unintended or negative consequences; (3) adoption rates of organisations and staff that would use the intervention and the characteristics of those organisations and staff; (4) implementation of the intervention as intended; and (5) maintenance of the effects at the individual level and sustainability of the intervention at an organisational or delivery level (RE-AIM). The RE-AIM framework has been used to review the literature in diverse health areas, such as physical activity during pregnancy [27] or among family caregivers [28], self-management programs for diabetes [29,30], and health literacy interventions [31].…”
Section: Internal and External Validity Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%