Interventions to increase tuberculosis case detection at primary healthcare or community-level services

Abstract

BackgroundPulmonary tuberculosis is usually diagnosed when symptomatic individuals seek care at healthcare facilities, and healthcare workers have a minimal role in promoting the health-seeking behaviour. However, some policy specialists believe the healthcare system could be more active in tuberculosis diagnosis to increase tuberculosis case detection.ObjectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness of different strategies to increase tuberculosis case detection through improving access (geographical, financial, educational) to tuberculosis diagnosis at primary healthcare or community-level services.Search methodsWe searched the following databases for relevant studies up to 19 December 2016: the Cochrane Infectious Disease Group Specialized Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), published in the Cochrane Library, Issue 12, 2016; MEDLINE; Embase; Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index; BIOSIS Previews; and Scopus. We also searched the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP), ClinicalTrials.gov, and the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) for ongoing trials.Selection criteriaRandomized and non-randomized controlled studies comparing any intervention that aims to improve access to a tuberculosis diagnosis, with no intervention or an alternative intervention.Data collection and analysisTwo review authors independently assessed trials for eligibility and risk of bias, and extracted data. We compared interventions using risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.Main resultsWe included nine cluster-randomized trials, one individual randomized trial, and seven non-randomized controlled studies. Nine studies were conducted in sub-Saharan Africa (Ethiopia, Nigeria, South Africa, Zambia, and Zimbabwe), six in Asia (Bangladesh, Cambodia, India, Nepal, and Pakistan), and two in South America (Brazil and Colombia); which are all high tuberculosis prevalence areas.Tuberculosis outreach screening, using house-to-house visits, sometimes combined with printed information about going to clinic, may increase tuberculosis case detection (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.79; 4 trials, 6,458,591 participants in 297 clusters, low-certainty evidence); and probably increases case detection in areas with tuberculosis prevalence of 5% or more (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.09; 3 trials, 155,918 participants, moderate-certainty evidence; prespecified stratified analysis). These interventions may lower the early default (prior to starting treatment) or default during treatment (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.96; 3 trials, 849 participants, low-certainty evidence). However, this intervention may have may have little or no effect on treatment success (RR 1.07, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.15; 3 trials, 849 participants, low-certainty evidence), and we do not know if there is an effect on treatment failure or mortality. One study investigated long-term prevalence in the community, but with no clea...

Active Case Finding for Tuberculosis through TOUCH Agents in Selected High TB Burden Wards of Kolkata, India: A Mixed Methods Study on Outcomes and Implementation Challenges

“…Systematic reviews have reported ACF to be beneficial in increasing case detection [5,6]. Also, studies have reported ACF to be beneficial in reducing the delay in TB diagnosis, out of pocket expenditure, unsuccessful treatment outcomes, and incidence of TB [3,7,8].…”

Spatial analysis of cases of Tuberculosis with Mental Disorders in São Paulo

“…Experiences evidenced in the literature, demonstrate successful actions of PC in prevention in relation to illicit drug use, especially in school environments (41) . Thus, PC and its professionals play an important role in the reduction of TB/MD cases, mainly through the implementation of strategies to improve access and diagnosis of these patients through active search (42) and coping with bottlenecks affect the follow-up actions of the cases, such as the absence of a link between professionals and patients and the difficulty of receiving this population in the health units (43) .…”

Effect of community active case-finding strategies for detection of tuberculosis in Cambodia: study protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial

“…Traditionally, TB cases are reported and passively notified when people with TB present themselves to a health facility. Active case finding (ACF), a proactive TB casefinding approach, has been adopted by countries affected by the epidemic, including Cambodia, to effectively reach people with TB [6][7][8]. Current evidence suggests that TB case-finding interventions at the community level may increase TB case detection [8].…”

“…Active case finding (ACF), a proactive TB casefinding approach, has been adopted by countries affected by the epidemic, including Cambodia, to effectively reach people with TB [6][7][8]. Current evidence suggests that TB case-finding interventions at the community level may increase TB case detection [8]. In Zimbabwe, Corbett et al demonstrated that ACF using a mobile van approach resulted in a higher yield of smear-positive TB cases compared to ACF conducted via door-to-door visits [9].…”