2015
DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(15)00266-7
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interventions to reduce suicides at suicide hotspots: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

6
120
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
6
120
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we certainly agree that mental illness is an important factor in suicide and that individual factors ranging from poverty to religious affiliation might have an important role in the development of suicidal desire in many individuals, our results indicate that such factors alone do not explain the association between guns and suicide. Our findings are thus highly consistent with the robust literature base supporting the utility of means safety in suicide prevention (Anestis & Anestis, ; Anestis et al., ; Kreitman, ; Oliver & Hetzel, ; Pirkis et al., ). Furthermore, our results provide a rebuttal to the notion of means substitution (Daigle, ), as gun ownership predicted overall state suicide rates, not simply firearm suicide rates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Although we certainly agree that mental illness is an important factor in suicide and that individual factors ranging from poverty to religious affiliation might have an important role in the development of suicidal desire in many individuals, our results indicate that such factors alone do not explain the association between guns and suicide. Our findings are thus highly consistent with the robust literature base supporting the utility of means safety in suicide prevention (Anestis & Anestis, ; Anestis et al., ; Kreitman, ; Oliver & Hetzel, ; Pirkis et al., ). Furthermore, our results provide a rebuttal to the notion of means substitution (Daigle, ), as gun ownership predicted overall state suicide rates, not simply firearm suicide rates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…A considerable amount of work has been done on preventing suicide at suicide hotspots, and three interventions show particular promise (ie, restricting access to means, encouraging help seeking and increasing the likelihood of intervention by a third party) 33 34. Restricting access to mean has been shown to be successful in places such as the stations in Hong Kong, Japan and South Korea,35–38 but may be difficult in places where the majority of cluster-related railway suicides occur on open tracks (as shown in our study).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some interventions have been shown to effectively reduce rail suicides (Pirkis et al, ; Too, Milner, Bugeja, & McClure, ). These include installation of physical barriers at rail stations (Chung, Kang, Matsubayashi, Sawada, & Ueda, ; Law et al ; Ueda, Sawada, & Matsubayashi, ; Xing, Lu, & Chen, ) and appropriate media reporting (Niederkrotenthaler & Sonneck, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The “Train the trainers” program in Germany and the “Contact with a (possibly) suicidal person” program in the Netherlands were designed to train rail personnel in how to intervene with people who might be at risk of suicide (Havarneanu, Bonneau, & Colliard, ). Although encouraging help‐seeking by installing signage displaying crisis helpline numbers has been shown to reduce suicides at some hot spot locations (e.g., US Mid‐Hudson bridge, England New Forest, Sydney Gap Park, and Hong Kong’s Cheung Chau) (Pirkis et al, ), this intervention has not been implemented within rail environment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%