2002
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.325.7370.925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interventions used in disease management programmes for patients with chronic illness---which ones work? Meta-analysis of published reports

Abstract: Objective To systematically evaluate the published evidence regarding the characteristics and effectiveness of disease management programmes. Design Meta-analysis. Conclusions All studied interventions were associated with improvements in provider adherence to practice guidelines and disease control. The type and number of interventions varied greatly, and future studies should directly compare different types of intervention to find the most effective. Data sources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

14
430
3
34

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 629 publications
(481 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
14
430
3
34
Order By: Relevance
“…e.g. Robinson and Steiner 1998;Weingarten et al 2002;Selby et al 2003;Knight et al 2005) would be transferable to the German health care system. Other concerns were directed less towards the programme itself and more against its integration in the system of risk structure compensation, and the incentives associated with this (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e.g. Robinson and Steiner 1998;Weingarten et al 2002;Selby et al 2003;Knight et al 2005) would be transferable to the German health care system. Other concerns were directed less towards the programme itself and more against its integration in the system of risk structure compensation, and the incentives associated with this (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IT facilitates the structured care necessary for high quality chronic disease management (Balas, Weingarten et al 2000;Bodenheimer, Wagner et al 2002;Weingarten, Henning et al 2002). Lack of IT potentially excludes prisoners from receiving an equivalent level of care compared to patients outside.…”
Section: Discussion Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Er zijn voldoende aanwijzingen dat deze aanpak leidt tot een betere functionele status, betere kwaliteit van leven van de oudere patiënt gedurende 12 maanden na de ziekenhuisopname, minder valincidenten, kortere ziekenhuisopname, minder (her)opnamen in ziekenhuizen en verpleeghuizen, beter geestelijk welzijn van de mantelzorgers, en lagere sterfte. 13,15,18,[20][21][22][23]25,[27][28][29][30] Beschrijvingen …”
Section: Achtergrondunclassified