Interviewing one's peers: methodological issues in a study of health professionals

Balancing – an equilibrium act between different positions: An exploratory study on general practitioners’ comprehension of their professional role

“…Interviewing one's peers implies some methodological issues [17]. For example, a common background and interests may promote confidence between the interviewer and the interviewee, and could augment the trustworthiness of the interviewer.…”

Primary Healthcare Professionals’ Experiences of the Sick Leave Process: A Focus Group Study in Sweden

“…The moderator (EN) had dual roles as both a researcher and clinician (physiotherapist from another county council) and as an insider. Insights can be gained by capitalizing on a shared culture and feelings of collegial trust [45]. The role of the moderator was to facilitate group interactions and conversations among the informants, which outweighs the risk of feelings of being judged.…”

Exploration of GPs' views and use of the fit note: a qualitative study in primary care

“…Interviewing one's peers is considered both a strength and a limitation. Prior topic knowledge and associated professional cultures enables a thorough exploration of the subject without explanation seeking and terminology clarification; 14,15 in addition, solidarity between professionals may encourage disclosure, 16 particularly in research addressing sensitive areas, including sickness certification. However, prior subject knowledge may prevent researchers from finding novel insights within their data 17 and being interviewed by a colleague may induce cautious responses for fear of judgement.…”

“…This study formed part of a larger project that required 15 GP participants; as such, 15 GPs were interviewed and included in this study; two GPs worked at the same practice. Interviews were undertaken between August and November 2010.…”