2016
DOI: 10.4238/gmr15048875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intestinal alkaline phosphatase and sodium butyrate may be beneficial in attenuating LPS-induced intestinal inflammation

Abstract: ABSTRACT. In this study, we evaluated the effect of intestinal alkaline phosphatase (IAP) and sodium butyrate (NaBu) on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced intestinal inflammation. Intestinal alkaline phosphatase and RelA/p65 (NF-κB) gene expressions in porcine jejunum explants were evaluated following exposure to sodium butyrate (NaBu) and essential oil from Brazilian red pepper (EO), alone or in combination with NaBu, as well as exogenous IAP with or without LPS challenge. Five piglets weighing approximately 20… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To further elucidate the RPEO effect in the animal organism, we carried out a jejunal explants assay evaluating RPEO effect on the anti‐inflammatory response. Although the intestinal mucosa had responded to the RPEO, increasing the modulation of pro‐inflammatory NF‐κB, no anti‐inflammatory effect was observed after inflammation induction by E. coli lipopolysaccharides . An in vivo assay studied the effect of RPEO in the relationship between the complex system composed by: microbiota, immune system, host response and feed–trophic effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To further elucidate the RPEO effect in the animal organism, we carried out a jejunal explants assay evaluating RPEO effect on the anti‐inflammatory response. Although the intestinal mucosa had responded to the RPEO, increasing the modulation of pro‐inflammatory NF‐κB, no anti‐inflammatory effect was observed after inflammation induction by E. coli lipopolysaccharides . An in vivo assay studied the effect of RPEO in the relationship between the complex system composed by: microbiota, immune system, host response and feed–trophic effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the intestinal mucosa had responded to the RPEO, increasing the modulation of pro-inflammatory NF-B, no anti-inflammatory effect was observed after inflammation induction by E. coli lipopolysaccharides. 13 An in vivo assay 14 studied the effect of RPEO in the relationship between the complex system composed by: microbiota, immune system, host response and feed-trophic effects. The higher villi density observed with the lowest level of RPEO (0.5 g kg −1 ) suggests a better intestinal development of weanling pigs, which can be positive for further growth performance throughout the next phases of swine production.…”
Section: Previous Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The focus on past feed additive research was to identify products with antimicrobial effects to replace antibiotics used as growth promoters (Kommera et al, 2006;Michiels et al, 2009). The emphasis of recent research has been to understand the other effects of feed additives, including the functional balance of immune response, development of gut, and glucose absorption into intestinal tract (Shen et al, 2009;Song et al, 2010;Wu et al, 2011;Gao et al, 2012;Melo et al, 2016;Waititu et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ex vivo techniques have been recently used to evaluate the effect of feed additives on immune response in swine tissues challenged by lipopolysaccharides (Smith et al, 2011;Bahar et al, 2012;Leonard et al, 2012). These techniques, in which intestine explants are exposed to different treatments, are a rapid, less expensive, specific, and reliable experimental model to determine the trophic effects of feed additives on intestinal mucosa (Basso et al, 2013;Bortoluzzi et al, 2016;Melo et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%