1992
DOI: 10.1016/0377-8401(92)90035-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intestinal digestibility of rumen undegraded protein of formaldehyde-treated feedstuffs measured by mobile bag and in vitro technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that the different individual proteins differ in amino acid compo sition and degradation rate within a feed, it is not surprising that in situ investiga tions of individual amino acid degradation have revealed differences in the ex tent of ruminal degradation between individual amino acids in numerous studies (Crooker et al, 1986;Susmel et al, 1989;Antoniewicz et al, 1992;Boila and Ingalls, 1992;Skorko-Sajko et al, 1994;Dakowski et al, 1996;Skiba et al, 1996;Weisbjerg et al, 1996), but in other investigations notable differences have not been observed (Varvikko et al, 1983;Weakley et al, 1983;van Stralen et al, 1997;Piepenbrink and Schingoethe, 1998). Rates of deamination of free amino acids in the rumen have been investigated by Chalupa (1976), who found that lysine, phenylalanine, leucine and isoleucine were broken down at 0.2 to 0.3 mmol h 1 , while arginine and threonine were more labile (0.5-0.9 mmol h 1 ) , methionine and valine were more stabile and deaminated at rates between 0.1 to 0.14 mmol h 1 .…”
Section: Degradation In the Rumen Of Amino Acids In Feed Proteinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that the different individual proteins differ in amino acid compo sition and degradation rate within a feed, it is not surprising that in situ investiga tions of individual amino acid degradation have revealed differences in the ex tent of ruminal degradation between individual amino acids in numerous studies (Crooker et al, 1986;Susmel et al, 1989;Antoniewicz et al, 1992;Boila and Ingalls, 1992;Skorko-Sajko et al, 1994;Dakowski et al, 1996;Skiba et al, 1996;Weisbjerg et al, 1996), but in other investigations notable differences have not been observed (Varvikko et al, 1983;Weakley et al, 1983;van Stralen et al, 1997;Piepenbrink and Schingoethe, 1998). Rates of deamination of free amino acids in the rumen have been investigated by Chalupa (1976), who found that lysine, phenylalanine, leucine and isoleucine were broken down at 0.2 to 0.3 mmol h 1 , while arginine and threonine were more labile (0.5-0.9 mmol h 1 ) , methionine and valine were more stabile and deaminated at rates between 0.1 to 0.14 mmol h 1 .…”
Section: Degradation In the Rumen Of Amino Acids In Feed Proteinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extent of reduction in ruminal degradability and degradation rate of CP depends on the level and method of treatment with formaldehyde (Setala and Syrjala-Qvist, 1984). Antoniewicz et al (1992b) demonstrated that RSM was more susceptible than other feeds (lupins, peas, field beans) to reduced intestinal CP digestibility caused by irreversible protection of CP through treatment with formaldehyde. In the present study, the low level of formaldehyde (1.1 g/kg DM, which is equivalent to 3.1 g/kg CP), applied in gaseous form under pressure, dramatically reduced effective degradability of CP and, to a lesser extent, DM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obtaining estimates of protein digestion in the small intestine are expensive and labour intensive, and require the use of intestinally surgically prepared animals. Various in vitro laboratory techniques have been used to predict intestinal digestion of proteins in ruminant feed ingredients, including pepsin-HCl with the MNB method (Antoniewicz et al, 1992;Van Straalen et al, 1993) and the three-step technique (Calsamiglia & Stern, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%