2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00281-009-0156-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intestinal macrophages: differentiation and involvement in intestinal immunopathologies

Abstract: Intestinal macrophages, preferentially located in the subepithelial lamina propria, represent the largest pool of tissue macrophages in humans. As an adaptation to the local antigen-and bacteria-rich environment, intestinal macrophages exhibit several distinct phenotypic and functional characteristics. Notably, microbe-associated molecular pattern receptors, including the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) receptors CD14 and TLR4, and also the Fc receptors for IgA and IgG are absent on most intestinal macrophages under … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
46
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
2
46
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…17 The strong correlation between the monocyte/macrophage enhancer signature with SNPs associated with ulcerative colitis, celiac disease, Crohn disease, or systemic lupus erythematosus is entirely consistent with the proposed role of human monocytes and macrophages in these diseases 14,48 and also confirms a previous, similar approach analyzing several cell lines. 49 Linking GWAS data with epigenetic enhancer signatures of different cell types could thus present an important step toward a functional annotation of noncoding disease variants.…”
Section: Enhancer Signatures and Their Relevance For Understanding DIsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…17 The strong correlation between the monocyte/macrophage enhancer signature with SNPs associated with ulcerative colitis, celiac disease, Crohn disease, or systemic lupus erythematosus is entirely consistent with the proposed role of human monocytes and macrophages in these diseases 14,48 and also confirms a previous, similar approach analyzing several cell lines. 49 Linking GWAS data with epigenetic enhancer signatures of different cell types could thus present an important step toward a functional annotation of noncoding disease variants.…”
Section: Enhancer Signatures and Their Relevance For Understanding DIsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Sequence tags from different donors were combined and tag counts were normalized to 10 7 specifically mapped tags. Published ChIP-sequencing (ChIP-seq) data for CD133 ϩ hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) 15 were remapped from raw sequence data to the GRCh37/hg19 assembly using Bowtie, 14 and local tag counts were normalized for GC nucleotide content to match the corresponding monocyte datasets using HOMER. 8 A summary of the ChIP-seq data used in this study is provided in supplemental Table 1.…”
Section: High-throughput Sequencing and Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The studies performed with human intestinal macrophages originating from subepithelial lamina propria are few, and limited to observations made in vitro. 28 Human intestinal macrophages have been demonstrated to display inability to mount an inflammatory response while retaining the ability to phagocytose microbes. 29 However, CD14 + lamina propria macrophages have been shown to induce pro-inflammatory cytokines including IL-1β and IL-6 30,31 indicating that intestinal macrophage population is not exclusively anti-inflammatory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mononuclear phagocyte numbers increase in the inflamed intestinal mucosa of patients with active IBD and a significant positive correlation has been noted between the number of infiltrating intestinal mononuclear phagocytes and the degree of crypt inflammation in UC. 24 Further studies will help delineate the differences in the mechanisms of action of the two compounds and aid in the elucidation of additional application for inflammatory disease with distinct underlying immunoregulatory deficiencies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%