2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intestine perforation by an accidental ingested SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal swab; a case report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Foreign body retention in the nasal cavity and GIT was reported in 15 and 8 patients, respectively. In all of them, the foreign bodies were successfully removed, apart from one patient, with a history of multiple surgeries in the GIT, in whom swallowing of the swab led to intestinal perforation 19 . Specimen collection swabs have a breakpoint mechanism to prevent contamination when transferring the shaft into the container, which makes them susceptible to accidental rupture 20 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foreign body retention in the nasal cavity and GIT was reported in 15 and 8 patients, respectively. In all of them, the foreign bodies were successfully removed, apart from one patient, with a history of multiple surgeries in the GIT, in whom swallowing of the swab led to intestinal perforation 19 . Specimen collection swabs have a breakpoint mechanism to prevent contamination when transferring the shaft into the container, which makes them susceptible to accidental rupture 20 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the length of the swab made it difficult. Nasal swabs can even perforate the sigmoid colon of adults ( 5 ). If nasal swab with a breakpoint is ingested, endoscopic removal should be attempted.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%