PsycEXTRA Dataset 2005
DOI: 10.1037/e515672006-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intimate Partner Violence Risk Assessment Validation Study: The RAVE Study Practitioner Summary and Recommendations: Validation of Tools for Assessing Risk from Violent Intimate Partners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These innovations have primarily been implemented outside of clinical settings and have demonstrated the effectiveness for reducing IPV among diverse populations of women. For decades, the Danger Assessment (http://dangerassessment.org) has been used in an array of settings including law‐enforcement and safe houses to identify women at risk of severe and/or lethal injury (Roehl, O'Sullivan, Webster, & Campbell, ). As the nursing role continues to expand in primary care settings (Wojnar & Whelan, ), nurses are often the first people to whom abused women will disclose IPV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These innovations have primarily been implemented outside of clinical settings and have demonstrated the effectiveness for reducing IPV among diverse populations of women. For decades, the Danger Assessment (http://dangerassessment.org) has been used in an array of settings including law‐enforcement and safe houses to identify women at risk of severe and/or lethal injury (Roehl, O'Sullivan, Webster, & Campbell, ). As the nursing role continues to expand in primary care settings (Wojnar & Whelan, ), nurses are often the first people to whom abused women will disclose IPV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the relationship assessment, the next component is the Danger Assessment (DA), a validated assessment of risk factors for severe repeat or lethal violence, such as the abuser's gun ownership, having children in the home of whom the abuser is not the biological parent, an increase in severity and frequency of violence, and abuser's use of alcohol/drugs (Campbell et al, ). A weighted scoring algorithm provides the user's DA score (range 0–38) graphically and with personalized messages about her level of danger based on her score: (1) variable danger (score < 8); (2) increased danger (score = 8–13); (3) severe danger (score = 14–17); and (4) extreme danger (score > 17; Campbell, Webster, & Glass, ; Roehl, O'Sullivan, Webster, & Campbell, ).…”
Section: Myplan App Development and Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low base rates make lethality prediction very difficult, and Campbell accepted that Bit is always difficult to predict, with our current statistical models and limited resources for longitudinal research, a seldom occurring event^ (Campbell 2005a(Campbell :1210. Roehl et al (2005) conducted a prospective study of the accuracy of four modelsthe Danger Assessment, DV-MOSAIC, the Domestic Violence Screening Instrument and the Kingston Screening Instrument for Domestic Violence. The study showed the assessments were better than chance, but there was a high level of false positives and sufficient false negatives to be of great concern.…”
Section: Earlier Studies On Prior Record Of Domestic Abuse Predictingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study found that 90% of the cases included fell within the receiver operator curve (ROC) suggesting that the DA is adept at identifying cases of lethal IPV in relation to non-lethal IPV [43]. Roehl et al [44] examined data provided by 1307 battered women and compared the test results of the DA with two other risk assessment questionnaires and the victims' perception of risk. The DA had the highest correlation with subsequent abuse, although the correlation was small (r = 0.38).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%