2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.linged.2021.100964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Into the void of discourse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Children were involved in the research process as active storying-players and meaning-makers. We positioned ourselves as learners by following our participants' lead to understand and acknowledge what was previously masked by cultural and linguistic bias (Arya, 2021). With a post-intentional phenomenological approach, we did not start with focal children to follow their lived experiences in silence.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children were involved in the research process as active storying-players and meaning-makers. We positioned ourselves as learners by following our participants' lead to understand and acknowledge what was previously masked by cultural and linguistic bias (Arya, 2021). With a post-intentional phenomenological approach, we did not start with focal children to follow their lived experiences in silence.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although textual materials are predominantly English, the center's library also contains multilingual texts, primarily in Spanish, which is the most frequently used language within the surrounding community. Programmatic and research initiatives associated with this center were grounded on a three-dimensional framework of agency, co-learning, and belonging; hence, centering literacy practices that are equitable and involve topics and interests relevant to the local community (Arya, 2022).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We view such efforts to incorporate relevant, engaging topics as intertwined with the call for raising critical readers of various textual media. Students benefit from explicit support in making textual inferences, identifying potential authorial biases, and questioning stated and implied assumptions in texts that may represent or affirm sociocultural inequities (Arya, 2022;McClung, 2018;McLaughlin & DeVoogd, 2004;Souto-Manning et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efforts to contrast contextual differences in student experiences brings us closer to understanding engagement beyond what a student is doing. However, what seems unaddressed, or rather 'silent' (Arya 2022) in such work is the role of the undergraduate educator, activity facilitator, or mentor in these community contexts. The bulk of studies about educators or program leaders center on the design of program-related activities or student outcomes that include final project quality and assessment performance (e.g., Hinga and Mahoney 2010;Mahoney and Stattin 2000;Smith et al 2009;Vandell et al 2012;Kataoka and Vandell 2013).…”
Section: Critically Contextualizing Student Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%