2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12098-017-2435-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intolerance and Violence Against Doctors

Abstract: Intolerance and grouse against doctors is a global phenomenon but India seems to lead the world in violence against doctors. According to World Health Organization, about 8-38% healthcare workers suffer physical violence at some point in their careers. Many more are verbally abused or threatened. Public is almost behaving like health sector terrorists. The spate of increasing attacks on doctors by damaging their property and causing physical injury is not acceptable by any civilized society. The public is beco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The systemic nature of negative provider behaviors in LMICs contributes to poor quality of care which, in turn, likely contributes to low service utilization and poor health outcomes. Additionally, as patients become increasingly dissatisfied with, and distrustful of, the medical community, providers in some countries are experiencing verbal harassment, physical attack, and death threats [6]. As such, failure to identify and address negative provider behavior could have wide-reaching consequences for both patients and health professionals.…”
Section: Negative Provider Behaviors: Impact and Motivational Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The systemic nature of negative provider behaviors in LMICs contributes to poor quality of care which, in turn, likely contributes to low service utilization and poor health outcomes. Additionally, as patients become increasingly dissatisfied with, and distrustful of, the medical community, providers in some countries are experiencing verbal harassment, physical attack, and death threats [6]. As such, failure to identify and address negative provider behavior could have wide-reaching consequences for both patients and health professionals.…”
Section: Negative Provider Behaviors: Impact and Motivational Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A doctor should understand some of those patient-related characteristics which may be associated with violence. While most of the items are associated with background psychological disturbance or substance abuse in the patient in the western examples of violence 8 , it does not have much implication in the current scenario of violence against doctors that has engulfed this country 4 5 19 23 24 25 26 27 28 .…”
Section: What a Doctor Can Or Should Do To Avoid Violence?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the observation by Mishra 21 of the general deterioration of the morality ethics of intellectual class in India and rise of pseudo intellectuals as well as his suggestion that the violence could also be viewed with the prism class war 22 need careful study. Several prescriptions for preventing violence to doctors have been provided in the literature starting from changing the curriculum of study, developing more communication skills, understanding by taking note of patients who could be violent, being cautious at violent venues, getting ready to run from the scene if situation demands, educating patients and their relatives, improving healthcare, etc 8 14 19 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 . While some of these prescriptions are implementable, some are obviously not.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Se muestra la violencia institucional ejercida sobre las personas que buscan atención médica y sus acompañantes. En los estudios sobre violencia institucional se diferencian aquellos que abordan el problema como maltrato y abuso ejercido sobre pacientes o estudiantes de medicina, y aquellos que lo abordan en términos de violencia, ejercida por pacientes sobre el personal de salud, y contra los usuarios (10)(11)(12)(13)(14). Muchos estudios construyen su objeto como un problema de calidad de la atención y no hacen una crítica de fondo de las instituciones de salud como agentes de control del Estado (15).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified