2018
DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2018.00054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra- and Inter-Scanner Reliability of Voxel-Wise Whole-Brain Analytic Metrics for Resting State fMRI

Abstract: As the multi-center studies with resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (RS-fMRI) have been more and more applied to neuropsychiatric studies, both intra- and inter-scanner reliability of RS-fMRI are becoming increasingly important. The amplitude of low frequency fluctuation (ALFF), regional homogeneity (ReHo), and degree centrality (DC) are 3 main RS-fMRI metrics in a way of voxel-wise whole-brain (VWWB) analysis. Although the intra-scanner reliability (i.e., test-retest reliability) of these met… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
79
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
79
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Significantly lower fluctuation in EO than in EC was found in the bilateral PSMC, SMA, paracentral lobule, thalamus, and primary auditory cortex (P < 0.05, corrected). All these results were highly consistent with previous studies [17,[22][23][24][25][26]. For mfALFF ( Fig 2E) and zfALFF ( Fig 2F), the pattern of difference between EO and EC was generally similar with that of mPerAF, zPerAF, mALFF, and zALFF, except for that in the frontal pole and PSMC.…”
Section: Paired T-test Between Eo and Ec For Peraf Alff And Falffsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Significantly lower fluctuation in EO than in EC was found in the bilateral PSMC, SMA, paracentral lobule, thalamus, and primary auditory cortex (P < 0.05, corrected). All these results were highly consistent with previous studies [17,[22][23][24][25][26]. For mfALFF ( Fig 2E) and zfALFF ( Fig 2F), the pattern of difference between EO and EC was generally similar with that of mPerAF, zPerAF, mALFF, and zALFF, except for that in the frontal pole and PSMC.…”
Section: Paired T-test Between Eo and Ec For Peraf Alff And Falffsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…1) We first provided detailed formation of PerAF by using simulated data. 2) We applied PerAF (mPerAF) to detect voxel-level differences between two resting states (eyes open [EO] vs. eyes closed [EC]) because the differences between EO and EC have been consistently reported in previous RS-fMRI studies [17,[22][23][24][25][26]. 3) We further assessed the test-retest reliability of PerAF (mPerAF).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the default mode network can be determined in literally each subject. Among the studies of between-condition comparison within a single group of subjects, differences between EO and EC resting conditions are significantly consistent across studies using FFT-ALFF (Yan et al, 2009;Liu et al, 2013;Zou et al, 2015;Zhao et al, 2018). Most clinical studies correspond to betweengroup comparison.…”
Section: Similarity Of Spatial Pattern Of Wavelet-amplitude Of Low-frmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Based on our previous research's methods and acquisition of the brain MRI data, MRI data will be firstly preprocessed and analyzed by SPM12 software performing on MATLAB 8.6 (Math works, Inc., Natick, MA, USA),Brain Voyager QXsoftware (Brain Innovation, The Netherlands) [56]. And then, for accurately investigate the different cerebral responses, including regional homogeneity (ReHo) [57], tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) [58,59], amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF) [60], and functional connectivity (FC) will be used in this study. Finally, correlation analysis will be processed between clinical data and MRI image data.…”
Section: Mri Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%