1992
DOI: 10.1159/000133275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra- and interspecific genome-size variation in the Salmonidae

Abstract: The nuclear DNA contents of 22 salmonid taxa, estimated primarily by flow-cytometric analysis relative to a chicken internal standard, were evaluated to compare intra- and interspecific variation in DNA content within this fish family. The average variability within taxa exceeded that among taxa. Intraspecific genome-size variation was substantial and, in some cases, exceeded the mean genome size for the species. The flow-cytometric method used here allows for rapid and reliable comparison of nuclear DNA conte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As far as the size of intraspecific DNA variation is concerned, the 21.13% amount that we observed in conspecific stick insects is higher than the intraspecific values of 13% reported for cyprinids (Gold and Price 1985) or the 15.5% reported for salmonids (Lockwood and Derr 1992). However, intraspecific variation as high as 31.9% has been observed in Trachemys turtle species (Lockwood et al 1991) Figs.…”
contrasting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As far as the size of intraspecific DNA variation is concerned, the 21.13% amount that we observed in conspecific stick insects is higher than the intraspecific values of 13% reported for cyprinids (Gold and Price 1985) or the 15.5% reported for salmonids (Lockwood and Derr 1992). However, intraspecific variation as high as 31.9% has been observed in Trachemys turtle species (Lockwood et al 1991) Figs.…”
contrasting
confidence: 64%
“…Although it is a common belief that the nuclear DNA content is constant within a species or that any variation would be negligible (Hinegardner 1968;Olmo 1983;CavalierSmith 1985), several recent papers have claimed the existence and pointed to the importance of intraspecific variations in both plants (Price at al. 1980;Laurie and Bennet 1985) and animals (Rao and Rai 1987;Gold and Amemiya 1987;Ferrari and Rai 1989;Ragland and Gold 1989;Alvarez-Fuster et al 1991;Lockwood et al 1991;Lockwood and Derr 1992;Ruedas et al 1993), that are presumably caused by gains or losses in various classes of DNA, including satellite DNA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intraspecific differences in DNA cell content have been reported (5, 29, 40, 41) for the fish species analyzed in this study. In spite of this, we found few differences for the individuals studied for each of the three species (minimum of 10 and maximum of 21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…However, the few studies which have been done at the population lev- (Sherwod and Patton 1982), fishes (Gold and Amemiya 1987;Gold, Ragland, and Schliesling 1990;Lockwood and Derr 1990), and insects, such as mosquitoes (Rao and Rai 1987;Black and Rai 1988;Warren and Crampton 1991) and Drosophila (Dawley 1997, pp. 143-184).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%