2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra-aortic balloon pump and survival with favorable neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A multicenter, prospective propensity score-matched study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, some RCTs revealed that IABP did not improve 30-day mortality in acute myocardial infarction and shock cases [ 7 , 16 ], but it was unclear whether IABP improved the clinically relevant outcomes among cardiac arrest patients. Our previous report using PS-matching also demonstrated that IABP was not associated with a better neurological outcome in patients with non-traumatic OHCA [ 8 ]; however, this study may have lacked power because of the sample size (N = 316 in the matched cohort). In addition, this study might have unmeasured bias due to the heterogeneity of the patients’ background because the study included both shockable and non-shockable patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previously, some RCTs revealed that IABP did not improve 30-day mortality in acute myocardial infarction and shock cases [ 7 , 16 ], but it was unclear whether IABP improved the clinically relevant outcomes among cardiac arrest patients. Our previous report using PS-matching also demonstrated that IABP was not associated with a better neurological outcome in patients with non-traumatic OHCA [ 8 ]; however, this study may have lacked power because of the sample size (N = 316 in the matched cohort). In addition, this study might have unmeasured bias due to the heterogeneity of the patients’ background because the study included both shockable and non-shockable patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Firstly, we estimated a PS using a logistic regression model that adjusted for the following 14 variables: year (2014–2019), sex (male or female), age (continuous value), witness status (no, yes), bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (no, yes), adrenaline administration at pre-hospital (no, yes), tracheal intubation at pre-hospital (no, yes), duration from call to hospital arrival (continuous value), first documented rhythm after hospital arrival (shockable, non-shockable, presence of pulse), adrenaline administration in-hospital (no, yes), coronary angiography (no, yes), target temperature management (no, yes), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (no, yes), and cause of arrest (cardiac, noncardiac). We chose these variables, which potentially affect the probability of treatment assignment, based on clinical knowledge and previous studies [ 8 ]. We performed receiver operating characteristic curve analysis with an area under the curve of PS for predicting IABP use in patients with OHCA.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By enhancing coronary blood stream through the diastolic portion of the cardiac cycle and relieving left ventricle stress through the systolic phase, the IABP is intended to improve myocardial perfusion. Out-ofhospital cardiac arrest patients have employed IABP as one of the percutaneous mechanical circulatory supports [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%